Not sure if you're aware, but I couldn't see any other discussion around it here (and I do use this feature myself so I figured it was worth raising). It appears that eCryptFS is going to be deprecated (see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZyKf6ZSZrETI+4%2FS@redbud/T/#u) and eventually removed from the Kernel.
Given this is currently the only way to encrypt an image easily as part of the standard wizard, it's probably worth looking at an alternative method for image encryption. Some alternative options I've thought of:
- Auto-mount a luks/veracrypt/bitlocker partition (could be cumbersome and not nesscarily well supported on all operating systems without additional applications)
- fscrypt, a good alternative, but relies on the host filesystem to natively support (wouldn't work with NTFS/FAT etc)
- Some sort of encrypted container file (something like 7z, this would be the closest to what we currently with have eCryptFS. not sure quite what formats would be viable)
Either way it's probably at least best adding a notice of deprecation explcitly to Clonezilla as well to let users know that it is being deprecated, and migration will likely be needed to transition to whatever alternative is developed, if any.
Not sure if you're aware, but I couldn't see any other discussion around it here (and I do use this feature myself so I figured it was worth raising). It appears that eCryptFS is going to be deprecated (see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZyKf6ZSZrETI+4%2FS@redbud/T/#u) and eventually removed from the Kernel.
Given this is currently the only way to encrypt an image easily as part of the standard wizard, it's probably worth looking at an alternative method for image encryption. Some alternative options I've thought of:
Either way it's probably at least best adding a notice of deprecation explcitly to Clonezilla as well to let users know that it is being deprecated, and migration will likely be needed to transition to whatever alternative is developed, if any.