Skip to content

MACS3 callpeak vs HMMRATAC #1954

@DineshRavindraRaju

Description

@DineshRavindraRaju

Hello All,

With the new Cell Ranger ARC v2, the built-in peak caller has improved compared to earlier versions. I’m wondering about best practices for downstream analysis with Seurat/Signac + MultiVI:

If ARC v2 already produces a higher-quality peak set, is it still recommended to re-call peaks with MACS3?

I’ve seen that HMMRATAC (implemented in MACS3) can give more biologically meaningful peaks . In practice, how does this compare to the ARC v2 peak sets or standard MACS3 in particular to 10xMultiome?

For downstream tasks like integration, clustering, differential accessibility, and peak-to-gene linking — which peak caller tends to give the most reliable results?

I’d really appreciate advice on whether it’s worth re-quantifying with external peak callers after ARC v2, or if ARC peaks are sufficient for most workflows.

Thank you!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions