-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathlec18_pp.typ
More file actions
177 lines (117 loc) · 3.78 KB
/
Copy pathlec18_pp.typ
File metadata and controls
177 lines (117 loc) · 3.78 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
= Poisson Processes
== Lecture 18 (PP)
New chapter, §2 in [D]
#pagebreak()
- In Stat 134 (or equivalent course) you have already seen Poisson Processes.
- In Stat 150, we'll study this fundamental process more rigorously.
#pagebreak()
- The (1-dimensional) Poisson Process is a point process on the line $[0, oo)$ with IID exponential "inter-arrival times" between points.
#figure[
#image(
"./figs/p18_16m.png",
width: 100%,
)
]
#pagebreak()
The Poisson Process is important because:
- Many real-world situations can be modeled using them:
- Cars arriving at a toll booth
- Galaxies in some region of the universe (3-D#footnote[$R^3$] Poisson Process)
#pagebreak()
- But also, many calculations work out nicely for the Poisson Process because exponential RVs have the "lack of memory" property.
- The exponential RV is, in fact, the *only* continuous RV with this property.
#pagebreak()
- In §3, we'll study "Renewal Processes" --- which have IID inter-arrival times, which need not be exponential.
- These processes are more complicated, so it is crucial we understand the Poisson Process well first.
#pagebreak()
§2.1 --- Exponential RVs
- This section is Stat 134 review.
*Please* read on your own to refresh your memory.
- We'll just quickly summarize here:
#pagebreak()
Recall: "Survival function" of a RV $X$ is
$
P(X > x) = 1 - F(x)#footnote[CDF]
$
*Def* $X ~ "Exp"(lambda)$, Exponential RV with *rate* $lambda$ if
$
P(X > x) = e^(-lambda x) , quad x >= 0.
$
#pagebreak()
To get PDF,
$
f(x) & = F'(x) = d/(d x) (1 - e^(-lambda x)) \
& = lambda e^(-lambda x).
$
Can show:
$
"E" X & = 1/lambda \
"Var" X & = 1/lambda^2
$
#pagebreak()
Other useful properties:
1. Lack of Memory (LoM):
$
P(X > t+s | X > t) = P(X > s)
$
$
["Proof: LHS" = (e^(-lambda (t+s)))/(e^(-lambda t)) = e^(-lambda s) = "RHS"]
$
$therefore$ Conditional on $X > t$, RV starts afresh at time $t$, as though it were a brand new $"Exp"(lambda)$.
// >>
#pagebreak()
2. Sum of $n$ IID $"Exp"(lambda)$ RVs is called a $"Gamma"(n, lambda)$.
$
T_n = sum_(i=1)^n T_i, quad T_i quad "IID" "Exp"(lambda).
$
$
f#footnote[PDF] _(T_n)(t) = lambda e^(-lambda t) ((lambda t)^(n-1))/((n-1)!) , quad t >= 0
$
- Proof: Induction (see [D]).
- Note: If $n=1$, $f(t) = lambda e^(-lambda t)$, so $"Gamma"(1, lambda) = "Exp"(lambda)$.
#pagebreak()
3. Minimum of independent exponential RVs is exponential. Its rate is the sum of rates:
Theorem. $X_i ~ "Exp"(lambda_i)$, and all $X_i$ independent. Then
i) $M = min{X_1, dots, X_n} =^d "Exp"(sum_(i=1)^n lambda_i)$
Moreover, let $I =$ index of smallest $X_i$, $M = X_I$. Then,
#pagebreak()
ii) $P(I=i) = (lambda_i) / (sum_(j=1)^n lambda_j)$ \
iii) $I, M#footnote[$= X_I$]$ are independent.
Part (iii) is perhaps the most surprising.
#pagebreak()
Proof:
i)
$
P(M > t) & = P("all" X_i > t) \
& = product_(i=1)^n P(X_i > t) "(indep.)" \
& = product_(i=1)^n e^(-lambda_i t) \
& = e^(-t sum_(i=1)^n lambda_i)
$
#pagebreak()
ii) Can be proved easily by induction --- see [D].
iii)
$
f_(I, M)(i, t) &= lambda_i e^(-lambda_i t) product_(j != i)#footnote[All other RVs must be bigger than $t$, i.e., survival function.] e^(-lambda_j t) \
&= (lambda_i)/(sum_j lambda_j) dot underbrace((sum_j lambda_j) e^(-(sum_j lambda_j)t), "PDF of a rate" sum lambda_i "Exp. RV.") \
&= P(I=i)#footnote[By part ii).] f_M (t)
$
#pagebreak()
§2.2 --- Defining the Poisson Process
Recall: $X tilde "Poisson"(mu)$ if
$
P(X=k) = e^(-mu) (mu^k)/(k!) , quad k=0, 1, 2, dots
$
Can show:
$
E X & = mu \
"Var" X & = mu
$
See [D].
#pagebreak()
Also easy to show:
*Theorem.*
If $X_i tilde "Poisson"(lambda_i)$ and all $X_i$ indep. Then
$
sum_(i=1)^n X_i tilde "Poisson"(sum_(i=1)^n lambda_i).
$
*Proof:* Stat 134. See [D], by induction. $quad square$