feat: Add 4-Cable Method example preset (#154)#356
feat: Add 4-Cable Method example preset (#154)#356learnerabhinavdwivedi-droid wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
Worried about impact? Review this PR in Change Stack to explore blast radius before you approve or request changes. Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 9 minutes and 34 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new preset implementing the 4-Cable Method (4CM): a JSON routing graph with eight sequential processing nodes (Input → Compressor → Overdrive → Wah → Amp Simulator → Delay → Reverb → Output) and documentation describing Pre-Amp and Post-Amp placement with a diagram. Changes4-Cable Method Preset
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Input
participant Compressor
participant Overdrive
participant Wah
participant AmpSimulator
participant Delay
participant Reverb
participant Output
Input->>Compressor: audio
Compressor->>Overdrive: compressed audio
Overdrive->>Wah: overdriven audio
Wah->>AmpSimulator: shaped tone
AmpSimulator->>Delay: amp-simulated signal
Delay->>Reverb: delayed signal
Reverb->>Output: reverberated signal
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@presets/05_4_Cable_Method.json`:
- Around line 2-23: The preset JSON uses the wrong schema: update the object
with routing: "graph", transform each node (e.g., entries with id values like
"node_input","node_comp", etc.) to remove nested position objects and instead
expose flat x and y properties on the node, and replace the "edges" array with
"links" where each link uses src and dst node ids plus src_pin/dst_pin keys
(instead of source/target); keep presetId "05_4_Cable_Method" and node ids the
same so the loader will recognize the 4-Cable Method routing.
In `@presets/PRESETS.md`:
- Line 41: The Mermaid code block terminator uses four backticks while the
opening fence uses three; update the closing fence to match the opening triple
backticks so the diagram renders correctly by replacing the four-backtick
terminator with three backticks after the "Reverb --> Out" block.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 3269165b-48ba-4687-b260-e8048c4b5164
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
presets/05_4_Cable_Method.jsonpresets/PRESETS.md
| Wah --> Amp | ||
| Amp --> Delay | ||
| Delay --> Reverb | ||
| Reverb --> Out No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix Mermaid code-fence terminator
Line 41 closes with four backticks while Line 9 opens with three. Use matching triple backticks so the diagram renders reliably.
Proposed fix
-````
+```🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@presets/PRESETS.md` at line 41, The Mermaid code block terminator uses four
backticks while the opening fence uses three; update the closing fence to match
the opening triple backticks so the diagram renders correctly by replacing the
four-backtick terminator with three backticks after the "Reverb --> Out" block.
learnerabhinavdwivedi-droid
left a comment
learnerabhinavdwivedi-droid
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CODE RABBIT CHANGES
1 participant
What does this PR do?
Related Issue
Fixes #
Type of Change
How Was This Tested?
./amplitron-testsChecklist
./amplitron-tests)std::mutex::lock()on the hot path)Screenshots / Demo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation