When looking at the contributors, there are several sets that caught my eye where there are lots of people with the same number of datasets attributed to them. One example is below.
It looks like these may be accurately reflecting what we have in the metadata, but it looks like some of these are large sets of things that are all related and that actually turn out not to resolving to the source data properly.
- We could look to see if we can find a parent record of some kind that represents all of these so we could weed out most of them.
- We may want a way that we can exclude or allow users to exclude things that aren't resolving most of the time when we check. Something similar to GeoMonitor.