|
| 1 | +PhyNEST: Phylogenetic Network Estimation using SiTe patterns |
| 2 | +Analysis start: 2024-06-02 at 20:03:17 |
| 3 | +Input file: example/sample_n5h1.txt |
| 4 | +Number of sequences: 5 |
| 5 | +Sequence length: 1000000 |
| 6 | +Starting Topology: (5,(2,(3,(4,1)))); |
| 7 | +Outgroup specified for rooting: 5 |
| 8 | +Number of maximum reticulation(s): 1 |
| 9 | +The maximum number of iterations for each optimization: 1000 |
| 10 | +Search algorithm selected: Hill climbing |
| 11 | +The maximum number of steps during search: 250000 |
| 12 | +The maximum number of consecutive failures: 150 (using maximum_number_of_failures provided) |
| 13 | +Output file store directory: /Users/khaosan/Dropbox/PhyNESTp.jl |
| 14 | +The number of processors for this analysis: 1 |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +(1/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:17 |
| 17 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(2,((4,3),1))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 18 | +The search terminated at step 80 and at 75th consecutive failures. |
| 19 | +Summary of each move: |
| 20 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 21 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 25 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 22 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 25 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 23 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 5 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 24 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 25 | +NNI: 23 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 26 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 21 unsuccessful moves. |
| 27 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 28 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 29 | +(1/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:3.771,(2:1.117,((1:0.933,(3:0.554,#H6:0.0::1.0):0.38):0.184,(4:0.554)#H6:0.563::0.0):0.0):2.654); |
| 30 | +(1/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.830966179213048e6 |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +(2/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:18 |
| 33 | +Starting topology changed to (5,((4,3),(2,1))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 34 | +The search terminated at step 102 and at 101th consecutive failures. |
| 35 | +Summary of each move: |
| 36 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 79 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 37 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 38 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 39 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 40 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 41 | +NNI: 22 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 42 | +On the current topology, 110 moves were made, including 9 unsuccessful moves. |
| 43 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 44 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 45 | +(2/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:4.071,((4:1.336,3:1.336):0.0,(2:0.638,1:0.638):0.698):2.736); |
| 46 | +(2/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.808939250517486e6 |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +(3/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:18 |
| 49 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(1,((4,3),2))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 50 | +The search terminated at step 105 and at 104th consecutive failures. |
| 51 | +Summary of each move: |
| 52 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 81 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 53 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 54 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 55 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 56 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 57 | +NNI: 23 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 58 | +On the current topology, 110 moves were made, including 6 unsuccessful moves. |
| 59 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 60 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 61 | +(3/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:3.865,(1:1.125,((4:1.125,3:1.125):0.0,2:1.125):0.0):2.739); |
| 62 | +(3/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.832807714960081e6 |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +(4/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:18 |
| 65 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(1,((4,2),3))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 66 | +The search terminated at step 92 and at 85th consecutive failures. |
| 67 | +Summary of each move: |
| 68 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 69 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 27 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 70 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 25 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 71 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 5 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 72 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 73 | +NNI: 33 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 74 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 11 unsuccessful moves. |
| 75 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 76 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 77 | +(4/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:4.274,(#H6:0.807::0.0,(((2:0.709,(4:0.709)#H6:0.0::1.0):0.01,3:0.719):0.273,1:0.992):0.523):2.758); |
| 78 | +(4/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.817041590497299e6 |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +(5/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:18 |
| 81 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(1,(2,(3,4)))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 82 | +The search terminated at step 106 and at 75th consecutive failures. |
| 83 | +Summary of each move: |
| 84 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 85 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 29 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 86 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 32 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 87 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 10 proposed, 2 accepted. |
| 88 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 89 | +NNI: 33 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 90 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 21 unsuccessful moves. |
| 91 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 92 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 93 | +(5/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:10.27,(4:5.197,((3:2.358,(2:0.38,#H6:0.0::0.62):1.978):1.273,(1:0.38)#H6:3.25::0.38):1.566):5.073); |
| 94 | +(5/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.741352247347821e6 |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +(6/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:20 |
| 97 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(1,(4,(2,3)))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 98 | +The search terminated at step 81 and at 75th consecutive failures. |
| 99 | +Summary of each move: |
| 100 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 101 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 27 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 102 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 25 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 103 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 6 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 104 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 105 | +NNI: 21 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 106 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 21 unsuccessful moves. |
| 107 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 108 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 109 | +(6/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:4.099,(#H6:0.57::0.0,(((2:0.632,3:0.632):0.314,(4:0.946)#H6:0.0::1.0):0.002,1:0.948):0.567):2.584); |
| 110 | +(6/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.79908686476507e6 |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +(7/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:20 |
| 113 | +Starting topology remains unchanged |
| 114 | +The search terminated at step 131 and at 75th consecutive failures. |
| 115 | +Summary of each move: |
| 116 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 117 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 38 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 118 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 42 proposed, 2 accepted. |
| 119 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 13 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 120 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 121 | +NNI: 36 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 122 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 21 unsuccessful moves. |
| 123 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 124 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 125 | +(7/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:10.28,(((1:2.363,(2:0.376,(3:0.376)#H6:0.0::0.379):1.988):1.268,#H6:3.255::0.621):1.572,4:5.202):5.077); |
| 126 | +(7/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.741362031645942e6 |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +(8/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:32 |
| 129 | +Starting topology changed to (5,((2,3),(1,4))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 130 | +The search terminated at step 108 and at 107th consecutive failures. |
| 131 | +Summary of each move: |
| 132 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 83 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 133 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 134 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 135 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 136 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 137 | +NNI: 24 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 138 | +On the current topology, 111 moves were made, including 4 unsuccessful moves. |
| 139 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 140 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 141 | +(8/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:4.076,((2:0.638,3:0.638):0.7,(1:1.338,4:1.338):0.0):2.738); |
| 142 | +(8/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.808848819713962e6 |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +(9/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:32 |
| 145 | +Starting topology changed to (5,((3,(1,4)),2)); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 146 | +The search terminated at step 140 and at 86th consecutive failures. |
| 147 | +Summary of each move: |
| 148 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 2 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 149 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 45 proposed, 4 accepted. |
| 150 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 34 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 151 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 11 proposed, 2 accepted. |
| 152 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 153 | +NNI: 47 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 154 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 10 unsuccessful moves. |
| 155 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 156 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 157 | +(9/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:9.873,(((3:1.57,(2:1.43)#H6:0.14::0.525):1.427,(#H6:0.0::0.475,1:1.43):1.567):1.981,4:4.979):4.894); |
| 158 | +(9/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.741344634057323e6 |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +(10/10) Searching for the best network using the hill climbing algorithm; 2024-06-02 at 20:03:39 |
| 161 | +Starting topology changed to (5,(3,(2,(1,4)))); using nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) |
| 162 | +The search terminated at step 79 and at 75th consecutive failures. |
| 163 | +Summary of each move: |
| 164 | +Insertion of reticulation edge: 1 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 165 | +Tail move of reticulation edge: 26 proposed, 1 accepted. |
| 166 | +Head move of reticulation edge: 25 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 167 | +Change the direction of reticulation edge: 5 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 168 | +Deletion of reticulation edge: 0 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 169 | +NNI: 21 proposed, 0 accepted. |
| 170 | +On the current topology, 96 moves were made, including 21 unsuccessful moves. |
| 171 | +Terminated although it neither reached the maximum number of steps or failures, |
| 172 | +possibly because there was no more move to make. |
| 173 | +(10/10) Estimated topology in this run: (5:3.743,(#H6:0.425::0.847,((2:0.96,((1:1.385,4:1.385):0.0)#H6:0.0::0.153):0.0,3:0.96):0.425):2.358); |
| 174 | +(10/10) Composite likelihood of the estimated topology in this run: 4.822329367341726e6 |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +Summary: |
| 177 | +Run Composite likelihood Network estimated |
| 178 | +1 4.8309662e6 (5:3.771,(2:1.117,((1:0.933,(3:0.554,#H6:0.0::1.0):0.38):0.184,(4:0.554)#H6:0.563::0.0):0.0):2.654); |
| 179 | +2 4.8089393e6 (5:4.071,((4:1.336,3:1.336):0.0,(2:0.638,1:0.638):0.698):2.736); |
| 180 | +3 4.8328077e6 (5:3.865,(1:1.125,((4:1.125,3:1.125):0.0,2:1.125):0.0):2.739); |
| 181 | +4 4.8170416e6 (5:4.274,(#H6:0.807::0.0,(((2:0.709,(4:0.709)#H6:0.0::1.0):0.01,3:0.719):0.273,1:0.992):0.523):2.758); |
| 182 | +5 4.7413522e6 (5:10.27,(4:5.197,((3:2.358,(2:0.38,#H6:0.0::0.62):1.978):1.273,(1:0.38)#H6:3.25::0.38):1.566):5.073); |
| 183 | +6 4.7990869e6 (5:4.099,(#H6:0.57::0.0,(((2:0.632,3:0.632):0.314,(4:0.946)#H6:0.0::1.0):0.002,1:0.948):0.567):2.584); |
| 184 | +7 4.741362e6 (5:10.28,(((1:2.363,(2:0.376,(3:0.376)#H6:0.0::0.379):1.988):1.268,#H6:3.255::0.621):1.572,4:5.202):5.077); |
| 185 | +8 4.8088488e6 (5:4.076,((2:0.638,3:0.638):0.7,(1:1.338,4:1.338):0.0):2.738); |
| 186 | +9 4.7413446e6 (5:9.873,(((3:1.57,(2:1.43)#H6:0.14::0.525):1.427,(#H6:0.0::0.475,1:1.43):1.567):1.981,4:4.979):4.894); |
| 187 | +10 4.8223294e6 (5:3.743,(#H6:0.425::0.847,((2:0.96,((1:1.385,4:1.385):0.0)#H6:0.0::0.153):0.0,3:0.96):0.425):2.358); |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +Best topology: (5:9.873,(((3:1.57,(2:1.43)#H6:0.14::0.525):1.427,(#H6:0.0::0.475,1:1.43):1.567):1.981,4:4.979):4.894);) |
| 190 | +End; |
0 commit comments