diff --git a/Documentation/Proposals/NNNN-evaluate-condition.md b/Documentation/Proposals/NNNN-evaluate-condition.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3fc8b9ad4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/Proposals/NNNN-evaluate-condition.md
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Public API to evaluate ConditionTrait
+
+* Proposal: [SWT-NNNN](NNNN-evaluate-condition.md)
+* Authors: [David Catmull](https://github.com/Uncommon)
+* Status: **Awaiting review**
+* Implementation: [swiftlang/swift-testing#909](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-testing/pull/909)
+* Review: ([pitch](https://forums.swift.org/t/pitch-introduce-conditiontrait-evaluate/77242))
+
+## Introduction
+
+This adds an `evaluate()` method to `ConditionTrait` to evaluate the condition
+without requiring a `Test` instance.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Currently, the only way a `ConditionTrait` is evaluated is inside the
+`prepare(for:)` method. This makes it difficult for third-party libraries to
+utilize these traits because evaluating a condition would require creating a
+dummy `Test` to pass to that method.
+
+## Proposed solution
+
+The proposal is to add a `ConditionTrait.evaluate()` method which returns the
+result of the evaluation. The existing `prepare(for:)` method is updated to call
+`evaluate()` so that the logic is not duplicated.
+
+## Detailed design
+
+The `evaluate()` method is as follows, containing essentially the same logic
+as was in `prepare(for:)`:
+
+```swift
+public func evaluate() async throws -> EvaluationResult {
+  switch kind {
+  case let .conditional(condition):
+    try await condition()
+  case let .unconditional(unconditionalValue):
+    (unconditionalValue, nil)
+  }
+}
+```
+
+`EvaluationResult` is a `typealias` for the tuple already used as the result
+of the callback in `Kind.conditional`:
+
+```swift
+public typealias EvaluationResult = (wasMet: Bool, comment: Comment?)
+```
+
+## Source compatibility
+
+This change is purely additive.
+
+## Integration with supporting tools
+
+This change allows third-party libraries to apply condition traits at other
+levels than suites or whole test functions, for example if tests are broken up
+into smaller sections.
+
+## Future directions
+
+This change seems sufficient for third party libraries to make use of
+`ConditionTrait`. Changes for other traits can be tackled in separate proposals.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+Exposing `ConditionTrait.Kind` and `.kind` was also considered, but it seemed
+unnecessary to go that far, and it would encourage duplicating the logic that
+already exists in `prepare(for:)`.
+
+In the first draft implementation, the `EvaluationResult` type was an enum that
+only contained the comment in the failure case. It was changed to match the
+existing tuple to allow for potentially including comments for the success case
+without requiring a change to the API.
diff --git a/Sources/Testing/Traits/ConditionTrait.swift b/Sources/Testing/Traits/ConditionTrait.swift
index 8e1117f8a..0ce1ff49c 100644
--- a/Sources/Testing/Traits/ConditionTrait.swift
+++ b/Sources/Testing/Traits/ConditionTrait.swift
@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@
 /// - ``Trait/disabled(if:_:sourceLocation:)``
 /// - ``Trait/disabled(_:sourceLocation:_:)``
 public struct ConditionTrait: TestTrait, SuiteTrait {
+  /// The result of evaluating the condition.
+  ///
+  /// - Parameters:
+  ///   - wasMet: Whether or not the condition was met.
+  ///   - comment: Optionally, a comment describing the result of evaluating the condition.
+  @_spi(Experimental)
+  public typealias EvaluationResult = (wasMet: Bool, comment: Comment?)
+
   /// An enumeration describing the kinds of conditions that can be represented
   /// by an instance of this type.
   enum Kind: Sendable {
@@ -30,7 +38,7 @@ public struct ConditionTrait: TestTrait, SuiteTrait {
     ///     `false` and a comment is also returned, it is used in place of the
     ///     value of the associated trait's ``ConditionTrait/comment`` property.
     ///     If this function returns `true`, the returned comment is ignored.
-    case conditional(_ body: @Sendable () async throws -> (Bool, comment: Comment?))
+    case conditional(_ body: @Sendable () async throws -> EvaluationResult)
 
     /// Create an instance of this type associated with a trait that is
     /// conditional on the result of calling a function.
@@ -41,7 +49,7 @@ public struct ConditionTrait: TestTrait, SuiteTrait {
     ///
     /// - Returns: An instance of this type.
     static func conditional(_ body: @escaping @Sendable () async throws -> Bool) -> Self {
-      conditional { () -> (Bool, comment: Comment?) in
+      conditional { () -> EvaluationResult in
         return (try await body(), nil)
       }
     }
@@ -79,19 +87,27 @@ public struct ConditionTrait: TestTrait, SuiteTrait {
 
   /// The source location where this trait was specified.
   public var sourceLocation: SourceLocation
-
-  public func prepare(for test: Test) async throws {
-    let result: Bool
-    var commentOverride: Comment?
-
+  
+  /// Evaluate this instance's underlying condition.
+  ///
+  /// - Returns: The result of evaluating this instance's underlying condition.
+  ///
+  /// The evaluation is performed each time this function is called, and is not
+  /// cached.
+  @_spi(Experimental)
+  public func evaluate() async throws -> EvaluationResult {
     switch kind {
     case let .conditional(condition):
-      (result, commentOverride) = try await condition()
+      try await condition()
     case let .unconditional(unconditionalValue):
-      result = unconditionalValue
+      (unconditionalValue, nil)
     }
+  }
+
+  public func prepare(for test: Test) async throws {
+    let (isEnabled, commentOverride) = try await evaluate()
 
-    if !result {
+    if !isEnabled {
       // We don't need to consider including a backtrace here because it will
       // primarily contain frames in the testing library, not user code. If an
       // error was thrown by a condition evaluated above, the caller _should_
diff --git a/Tests/TestingTests/RunnerTests.swift b/Tests/TestingTests/RunnerTests.swift
index 857cfdd81..9bd33c9da 100644
--- a/Tests/TestingTests/RunnerTests.swift
+++ b/Tests/TestingTests/RunnerTests.swift
@@ -332,6 +332,32 @@ final class RunnerTests: XCTestCase {
     let test2 = Test(.disabled(if: Bool.random())) { }
     XCTAssertTrue(test2.traits.compactMap { $0 as? ConditionTrait }.allSatisfy { !$0.isConstant })
   }
+  
+  func testEvaluateConditionTrait() async throws {
+    let comment: Comment = "comment"
+    let trueUnconditional = ConditionTrait(kind: .unconditional(true), comments: [], sourceLocation: #_sourceLocation)
+    let falseUnconditional = ConditionTrait.disabled()
+    let enabledTrue = ConditionTrait.enabled(if: true)
+    let enabledFalse = ConditionTrait.enabled(if: false)
+    let enabledTrueComment = ConditionTrait(kind: .conditional { (true, comment) }, comments: [], sourceLocation: #_sourceLocation)
+    let enabledFalseComment = ConditionTrait(kind: .conditional { (false, comment) }, comments: [], sourceLocation: #_sourceLocation)
+    var result: ConditionTrait.EvaluationResult
+    
+    result = try await trueUnconditional.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertTrue(result.wasMet)
+    result = try await falseUnconditional.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertFalse(result.wasMet)
+    result = try await enabledTrue.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertTrue(result.wasMet)
+    result = try await enabledFalse.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertFalse(result.wasMet)
+    result = try await enabledTrueComment.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertTrue(result.wasMet)
+    XCTAssertEqual(result.comment, comment)
+    result = try await enabledFalseComment.evaluate()
+    XCTAssertFalse(result.wasMet)
+    XCTAssertEqual(result.comment, comment)
+  }
 
   func testGeneratedPlan() async throws {
     let tests: [(Any.Type, String)] = [