License inconsistency ? LICENSE file vs composer.json

[Rom1Bastide]

The project has conflicting license information:

• LICENSE file: GNU AGPL v3
• composer.json: MIT

This creates legal ambiguity.

What should be the case?

The LICENSE file contains the complete GNU AGPL v3 text, which suggests this is the intended license.
However, composer.json shows MIT.

Recommendation

Please clarify which is the official license and align both files.

If AGPL v3 is correct:

• Update composer.json to: "license": "AGPL-3.0-or-later" ou AGPL-3.0-only

If MIT is correct:

• Replace LICENSE file with MIT license

Thank you!

[Denise-s-S10]

#20