Skip to content

High background mutation of CtoT GtoA mutations #164

@Error-fre

Description

@Error-fre

I took only read1 of paired-end sequencing for my samples and after running slam-dunk all, I used alleyoop rates to calculate the overall conversion rates. I have around 0.5 conversion rate at AtoG(- strand) and TtoC (+ strand) which is expected with my 1hr labeling. However I got 0.7 conversion rate of CtoT(- strand) and GtoA (+ strand) in all my samples including nolabel control.

Have anyone encountered this before? Is it a mapping problem or sample prep problem?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions