Skip to content

Forward compatibility of ignoring unknown keys in the import(…) options bag #121

Open
@fstirlitz

Description

@fstirlitz

This proposal adds a second… operand(?) to the import(...) expression, an options bag. As I understand it, it is meant to be an extensible mechanism that other language enhancements that modify the importing process may take advantage of.

As currently specified, EvaluateImportCall is defined to ignore the presence of unrecognized keys in the options bag. As far as this proposal is concerned, this is fine, because assertions are meant to be applied opportunistically, and if they pass, they don’t change the semantics of importing; however, there are already proposals in the works building upon this one that do. For example, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-reflection may import the module as an entirely different object.

My question is, how is user code to know whether an import option was actually taken into account by the host? How should it prevent a situation where an import call ostensibly returns success, but with the wrong semantics? (e.g. importing a JSON file as if it were an ECMAScript module)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions