-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Open
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
What happened?
When trying to call an export with remote binding from the client to the server, an exception occurs that the object reference is not set to an instance.
I'm thinking that by looking at Exports.cs, it seems like REMOTE_FUNCTION_ENABLED is false. My code should be perfectly fine.
Client call
string json = await Exports["serverresource", "dosomething"]();Example server export
[Export("dosomething", Binding.Remote)]
public string DoSomething()
{
return "{}";
}Client logs
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ at NRP_JobManager.Client.Handlers.JobHandler+<SingleJobTick>d__5.MoveNext () [0x00557] in <190051bc189e4252990e44c10ec23095>:0
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw () [0x0000c] in <b575c7ac070e41ffa0751333b6ac9f42>:0
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ at CitizenFX.Core.Coroutine.GetResult () [0x00000] in C:\gl\builds\cfx-fivem\master\fivem\code\client\clrcore-v2\Coroutine\Coroutine.cs:201
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ at CitizenFX.Core.CoroutineAwaiter.GetResult () [0x00000] in C:\gl\builds\cfx-fivem\master\fivem\code\client\clrcore-v2\Coroutine\Coroutine.cs:296
[ 646110] [b2944_GTAProce] MainThrd/ at CitizenFX.Core.CoroutineRepeat+<Execute>d__6.MoveNext () [0x00032] in C:\gl\builds\cfx-fivem\master\fivem\code\client\clrcore-v2\Coroutine\CoroutineRepeat.cs:41
Expected result
The export to be called, thus returning data.
Reproduction steps
1. Create a server export with a remote binding
2. Call this export from the client script of another resourceImportancy
Can't use this feature until fixed
Specific version
FiveM, latest as of today
Extra
This might also be a misunderstanding of the available documentation as of now, but I suspect it as a bug.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request