Skip to content

Explore the possibility of putting all type annotations in patterns #11

@thufschmitt

Description

@thufschmitt

So instead of λp:τ.e, we would get λp.e, but with p containing − mandatory − type matching.

For example, x:τ would be the pattern matching on values of type τ

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions