The fail crate's crate-level doc-comment first says—
|
//! this it is a best practice to put all fail point unit tests into their own |
|
//! binary. Here's an example of a snippet from `Cargo.toml` that creates a |
—and then later says—
|
//! fail points. Put test cases exercising fail points into their own test |
|
//! crate. |
Should the latter advice say "binary" rather than "crate"?
The
failcrate's crate-level doc-comment first says—fail-rs/src/lib.rs
Lines 107 to 108 in 2cf1175
—and then later says—
fail-rs/src/lib.rs
Lines 219 to 220 in 2cf1175
Should the latter advice say "binary" rather than "crate"?