generalized when nimvm:
#507
timotheecour
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
/cc @xflywind you suggested:
VM and gen should use separate ConfigRef/optionsbut I'm not sure how that'd work.I'm opening this as a place holder to discuss this.
This is also very related to
when nimvmconstruct in compiler; the current implementation fornimvmhas many known limitations which make it more awkward to use than we'd like.example 1
int.sizeof is 4 for js + rt and therefore also 4 for js+vm even on a 64bit platform
example 2
see all bugs/limitations of
when nimvmvery rough idea
allow this (currently impossible):
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions