Clarify Working Group vs Topic in TODO charter

[anajsana]

Make explicit in TODO charter the difference between a WG and a Topic.

Proposed direction:

• A WG is a group or participants in the community responsible for maintaining a specific artifact/output (docs, frameworks, reference implementations, recurring deliverables)

• A topic is a discussion space in the community for exploration and early-stage ideas.

To promote a Topic into a WG, there must be a charter in place that defines the mission, vision, appointed chairs, and additional roles if applicable, expected outcomes, reporting, and project workflow

Vote: Approve WG vs Topic definitions and the promotion criteria/process. If approved, open a PR to add this section in TODO charter for SC to approve and review

[anajsana]

/vote

[git-vote]

Vote created

@anajsana has called for a vote on Clarify Working Group vs Topic in TODO charter (#405).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@todogroup/gitvote-steering

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor	Against	Abstain
👍	👎	👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 28days. It will pass if at least 51% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

[natalisucks]

This is great, @anajsana! Thanks for putting this together from our in-person steering meeting at LFMS.