Skip to content

2024-11 Public Service Announcement (PSA) - todo.txt project effectively unmaintained #100

@clach04

Description

@clach04

I'm super grateful for this specification but for anyone who spots problems or has ideas for enhancements, be aware that based on the past few years I believe it unlikely any changes will be merged into the official standard. A number of minor (clarifying) changes that don't fundamentally change the spec have not been merged, hence why I think it unlikely. The original maintainers likely don't have the time/energy to work on this any more.

If you have something cool to share, definitely post here, there are a number of people who are still interested, monitoring, and participating who'll likely be interested in what you have to share.

If you really think you have something new on the standards front, I recommend you fork/make a new standard with a different name to avoid name clashes (you can still retain todo.text compatibility). It's not something to take on likely, you'll likely have a lot of interest 😀. I personally don't have the time/energy to do that.

Definitely read through the existing PRs and issues 😉

Again, thank you to everyone who participates! ❤️ The discussion in issues and PRs has helped me understand a few nuances of the spec that could not be gleaned from the spec as it was initially written.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions