| title | Pandoc-gls test document | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| author | Thomas Cooper | |||
| date | 02/03/2019 | |||
| header-includes |
|
|||
| include-after |
|
Welcome to (+pandoc-gls)' test source code document. But I really don't want this -> (-pandoc-gls) or this (-+^FOO) to be linked to the glossary!
You have to watch out for those (+^BAR), they are (+^FOO) (although (+BAZ) disagrees). (++^FOO) should not be trusted! Also watch out for the (+BAR)'s dog it is a biter!
Some other text with emphasised glossary terms (+FOO) (+BAZ)
We also need to make sure the surrounding punctuation and characters are not ignored:
- ((+FOO)).
- ((++BAZ)),
- ((+^BAR))!?!?!?!
- (+pandoc-gls)oloing
Some inline code code ac (+^BAZ).
Why not have a table:
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Dave | (+BAR) |
| (+BAZ) | (++FOO) |