The Rational Apostrophe — open feedback and refinements

[torpid-prey]

Welcome to the open discussion for The Rational Apostrophe (Strict Attribution) system — a modern, logical framework for English apostrophe use.

This proposal redefines how apostrophes are used, limiting them to possession, omission, or clarity — never mere association.
You can read the full guide here: README.md

---

💡 Purpose

To refine, challenge, and expand the system through collaborative examples, counterexamples, and edge cases.
Feedback is welcome on:

• Logical consistency across new scenarios
• Edge cases involving plural/irregular nouns
• Public readability or teaching clarity
• Situations where omitting the apostrophe might cause confusion

---

🗨️ How to Contribute

• Post an example or question (e.g. “Should ‘artists gallery’ take an apostrophe?”)
• Vote or comment on other examples to build consensus
• Share evidence from signage, literature, or real-world usage that supports or challenges a rule

---

📘 References

• Main style guide: README.md
• Examples: examples.md
• License: LICENSE

---

Thanks for helping shape a more consistent and rational English punctuation system.
Every contribution helps refine the logic and future adoption of the Rational Apostrophe.