Skip to content

ltree relationships #81

Open
Open
@boris-glumpler

Description

@boris-glumpler

Just wondering out loud here, but would it be within the scope of this package to add relationships based on an ltree column? So something like children, parent and ancestors. Maybe even to a given depth?

I've just used ltree for a comments system and ended up doing two queries. The first one gets a paginator just for the first level and the second one gets any children for the items in that paginator. I then have a tree class that builds up the hierarchy, sorts it properly and sets the resulting collection back on the paginator. It'll work just fine for my use case as there won't be many comments at all and even less nested ones, but it got me wondering if this couldn't be solved more efficiently.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions