Publish updated Ink Foundation Governance System report

[sfmiller1]

No description provided.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[claude]

Claude finished @sfmiller1's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Ink Foundation Governance System Report

I've completed my review of this pull request that adds a new security review report PDF.

Review Tasks:

• Analyze repository structure and guidelines
• Review file naming and placement
• Check if README.md needs updating
• Provide feedback on PR compliance

✅ Positive Findings

1. File Naming Convention: The file 2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf follows the established naming pattern (YYYY-MM-client-product-securityreview.pdf) correctly.

2. File Placement: The file is placed in the correct reviews/ directory alongside other security review reports.

3. Date Format: The date format (2025-07) follows the repository's guidelines using the correct YYYY-MM format.

⚠️ Issue Found: Missing README.md Update

The main issue with this PR is that the README.md file needs to be updated to include an entry for this new security review. Based on the repository structure, this entry should be added to the appropriate section in the Security Reviews section.

Required Action: The README.md needs a new table entry with the following information:

• Product name: "Ink Foundation Governance System"
• Date: Jul 2025
• Level of Effort: [needs to be provided]
• Announcement: [if available]
• Report: Link to the PDF file

📋 Recommendations

1. Determine Section Placement: Please specify which section this review belongs in:

   • Technology Product Reviews (if it's a general governance platform)
   • Other/Multi-Chain (if it's a blockchain governance system)
   • Or create a new subsection if appropriate

2. Follow Date Ordering: Per repository guidelines, entries should be sorted by date (newest first) within each section.

3. Complete Missing Information: Please provide:

   • Level of effort (in person-weeks)
   • Announcement link (if available)
   • Appropriate document icon (likely 📄 for security review)

📝 Example Entry Format

Based on the existing patterns, the entry should look like:

| [Ink Foundation Governance System](https://linktocompany.com/) | Jul 2025 | [effort] | [announcement] | [📄](reviews/2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf) |

🎯 Next Steps

To complete this PR, please:

1. Update the README.md file with the appropriate table entry
2. Specify which section the entry belongs in
3. Provide the missing level of effort information
4. Add an announcement link if available

The PDF file itself is properly formatted and placed correctly. Once the README.md is updated, this PR will be compliant with the repository guidelines.

[claude]

Claude finished @sfmiller1's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Ink Foundation Governance System Report

Review Tasks:

• Analyze README.md changes
• Verify repository guidelines compliance
• Check PDF file placement and naming
• Provide comprehensive review feedback

✅ Improvements Made

Great progress! The README.md has been updated to address the previous feedback. The new security review entry has been added to the appropriate Ethereum/EVM section.

⚠️ Issues Found

1. Date Format Violation (README.md:700)

Current: July 2025
Required: Jul 2025

Per repository guidelines in CLAUDE.md:

Use 3-letter abbreviations for all month names to save space in the layout: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec

2. Table Formatting Issue (README.md:700)

Current: | [Ink Foundation Governance System](https://inkonchain.com/) | July 2025 | 1 | | [📄✅](reviews/2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf) |

Issues:

• Date format needs to be "Jul 2025" not "July 2025"
• Empty announcement cell should have a single space: | | not | |

3. Sort Order Concern

The entry appears to be placed at the top of the Ethereum/EVM section, but entries should be sorted by date (newest first). With "July 2025" this would be correct, but please verify this is the proper chronological position.

✅ Positive Findings

1. Correct Section: Entry is properly placed in the Ethereum/EVM section
2. File Naming: PDF follows the correct naming convention: 2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf
3. File Location: PDF is correctly placed in the reviews/ directory
4. Document Icons: Uses 📄✅ indicating security review + fix review, which is appropriate
5. Level of Effort: Properly specified as 1 person-week
6. Company Link: Includes appropriate link to Ink Foundation website

📝 Required Fix

Line 700 should be changed from:

| [Ink Foundation Governance System](https://inkonchain.com/) | July 2025 | 1 | | [📄✅](reviews/2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf) |

To:

| [Ink Foundation Governance System](https://inkonchain.com/) | Jul 2025 | 1 | | [📄✅](reviews/2025-07-inkfoundation-governancesystem-securityreview.pdf) |

🎯 Summary

This PR successfully addresses the previous feedback by adding the required README.md entry. The only remaining issue is the date format violation - "July" should be "Jul" to comply with repository guidelines.

Once the date format is corrected, this PR will be fully compliant with the repository standards.

---