Skip to content

SKILL.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (44 loc) · 3.72 KB

SKILL.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (44 loc) · 3.72 KB
Raw
name hr-talent-mapping
description Help TA leaders and workforce planners build individual-level talent maps that track named candidates, internal successors, and external targets against current and future roles. Use when asked to map talent against future roles, build a bench for [role], track external talent for succession, create a talent pipeline map, or identify named candidates for a future opening.
metadata
author version
Tuan Duc Tran
1.0.1

Talent mapping

Track named individuals — internal successors and external targets — against current and anticipated roles, so hiring and succession decisions can draw on a ready bench instead of starting a search from zero.

Supported tasks

  • Building named-candidate maps for critical or hard-to-fill roles
  • Cross-referencing internal succession candidates with external benchmarks
  • Tracking external talent relationships over time (warm leads, past applicants, silver medalists)
  • Mapping talent against anticipated future roles from workforce plans
  • Identifying readiness gaps between mapped candidates and role requirements
  • Prioritizing which mapped candidates to nurture actively vs. monitor passively
  • Coordinating talent mapping with succession planning and 9-box reviews
  • Building geography- or function-specific talent benches
  • Refreshing talent maps as candidates change roles or companies
  • Reporting bench strength and coverage gaps to leadership
  • Feeding talent maps into proactive nurture and CRM campaigns
  • Aligning talent mapping cadence with business planning cycles

Key prompts

Building talent maps

  1. "Build a named-candidate talent map for [role/function] with 3 internal and 5 external candidates, noting readiness and interest level for each."
  2. "Cross-reference our internal succession bench for [role] against external benchmarks to identify capability gaps."
  3. "What criteria should we use to decide whether a mapped candidate is 'ready now', 'ready in 1-2 years', or 'watch only'?"
  4. "Map talent against the roles in our [3-year] workforce plan for [function]."

Maintaining and prioritizing

  1. "Which mapped candidates for [role] should we actively nurture this quarter given upcoming openings?"
  2. "Design a cadence for refreshing talent maps so they don't go stale between planning cycles."
  3. "How do we track a 'silver medalist' candidate from a past search without it feeling transactional?"
  4. "Flag mapped candidates for [role] who may have changed companies or roles recently and need re-verification."

Reporting and integration

  1. "Summarize bench strength and coverage gaps for [critical role family] for the leadership talent review."
  2. "How should talent mapping data feed into our succession planning and CRM nurture workflows?"
  3. "Build a talent map dashboard structure showing coverage ratio (mapped candidates per critical role) by function."
  4. "Draft a quarterly talent mapping update format that highlights what changed since the last leadership review."

Tips

  • Talent mapping only creates value if someone owns keeping it current — assign clear ownership and a refresh cadence, not a one-time exercise.
  • Separate "map" from "pipeline" — mapping identifies who exists and where; nurturing and engagement are separate, deliberate follow-on activities.
  • Coordinate closely with succession planning so internal and external maps use the same readiness language and don't create conflicting signals.
  • Respect candidate relationships — repeated informal check-ins without a real opportunity can feel exploitative; be transparent about intent when engaging mapped candidates.
  • Prioritize mapping effort on roles with real business risk (critical, hard-to-fill, or single point of failure) rather than mapping everything equally.