Repo Label Standardization #1439
Locked
spring4175
started this conversation in
Development & RFCs
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
There are a few things that I would like cleared up in our spec:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I have also deprecated |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
#1432 inspired me to take a look at our labels and standardize them. Here's what I've done:
t-github-actionstot-cit-featuretot-featt-releasetom-release; likem-breaking-changein that it is related to the project but does not have final inherent meaning or purposet-enhancement; this label should not be used anymore. Previous instances should be relabeled ast-refactor,t-perf,t-feat, or other appropriate labels so we can remove it. It's now namedt-enhancement-DEPRECATEDwith a scary red backgroundt-perffor PRs with the intent of improving performancet-testfor PRs with the sole intent of adding or refactoring testsNow that we don't have
t-enhancementanymore it will be easier for us to determine whether something is a new feature, thus requiring a new minor version.Labels are now based on conventional commit types, and more specifically the Angular convention. Therefore, commits should also follow this standard.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions