Documentation standards #1808
7596ff
started this conversation in
Development & RFCs
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Some things came up in #1792, which should be discussed further. Please feel free to add more suggestions and opinions, project-wide.
Redundant associated type link
twilight/model/src/channel/message/mod.rs
Lines 118 to 120 in 94c8e00
I don't think we should link to a type if it is already linked in the field itself.
Associated type ID link
twilight/model/src/channel/message/mod.rs
Lines 121 to 125 in 94c8e00
I'm not sure if we should link to the type an ID eventually, logically points to, I think decisions should be made on a case by case basis but I'm not sure what the criteria are.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions