Skip to content

Commit a3115c4

Browse files
committed
content fixes
1 parent 17dc075 commit a3115c4

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed
  • src/app/blog/serverless-sql-databases-compared

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

src/app/blog/serverless-sql-databases-compared/page.mdx

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ But "serverless SQL" has become a crowded space. Between the Postgres-alikes and
3131

3232
Before we look at the specific tools, it’s worth noting why these feel different from traditional RDS. They all fundamentally separate **Compute** from **Storage**.
3333

34-
In a legacy setup, your database is a VM that’s always running. In serverless land, your data sits in a storage layer (like S3 or a specialized distributed layer), and the "Compute" (the SQL engine) only spins up when a query hits it. This is how we get "Scale to Zero", if no one is using your app, you aren't paying for a CPU to sit idl. You can get a deeper [comparison of serverless vs traditional databases here](https://datavidhya.com/blog/serverless-sql-database/)
34+
In a legacy setup, your database is a VM that’s always running. In serverless land, your data sits in a storage layer (like S3 or a specialized distributed layer), and the "Compute" (the SQL engine) only spins up when a query hits it. This is how we get "Scale to Zero", if no one is using your app, you aren't paying for a CPU to sit idle. You can get a deeper [comparison of serverless vs traditional databases here](https://datavidhya.com/blog/serverless-sql-database/)
3535

3636
---
3737

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)