diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/LICENSE b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/LICENSE
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..887929fe6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/LICENSE
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Ryan Schuetzler
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/README.md b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..413007f6e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# misq
+
+A Typst template for MIS Quarterly manuscript submissions.
+
+This template reproduces MISQ's formatting requirements in Typst, including Times New Roman body text, double-spaced paragraphs, three-level numbered headings, a title page with abstract and keywords, and APA 7th edition citations via a bundled CSL file. Authors can write and submit manuscripts without LaTeX.
+
+## Usage
+
+Import the template from Typst Universe:
+
+```typst
+#import "@preview/magnificent-misq:0.1.0": misq
+```
+
+Set up the document with your manuscript metadata:
+
+```typst
+#show: misq.with(
+ title: [Your Manuscript Title],
+ abstract: [
+ Your abstract text here.
+ ],
+ keywords: ("keyword one", "keyword two", "keyword three"),
+ paragraph-style: "indent",
+)
+```
+
+See `template/main.typ` for a complete example document.
+
+## Parameters
+
+The `misq()` function accepts the following parameters:
+
+| Parameter | Type | Description |
+|-----------|------|-------------|
+| `title` | content | Manuscript title |
+| `abstract` | content | Abstract text |
+| `keywords` | array of strings | Keyword list |
+| `paragraph-style` | string | `"indent"` for first-line indented paragraphs (default) or `"block"` for block paragraphs with spacing between them |
+
+## Features
+
+- Three heading levels with automatic numbering (1, 1.1, 1.1.1)
+- APA 7th edition citations via bundled CSL file
+- Title page with abstract and keywords
+- Double-spaced body text
+- Correct margins per MISQ submission guidelines
+- Single-spaced bibliography, figures, and tables
+
+## Bibliography
+
+Add your references with a standard Typst bibliography call placed after the body:
+
+```typst
+#bibliography("references.bib", title: "References")
+```
+
+The template automatically applies APA 7th edition formatting. Do not pass a `style:` argument — the template handles it.
+
+## License
+
+MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE)
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/apa.csl b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/apa.csl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..9bc45ef628
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/apa.csl
@@ -0,0 +1,2273 @@
+
+
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/misq.typ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/misq.typ
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b219efec33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/misq.typ
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+// misq.typ — MIS Quarterly submission template for Typst
+//
+// Font: Times New Roman is required by MISQ.
+// "Times" is the macOS/Linux fallback if TNR is not installed.
+// No runtime font check — silent fallback per MISQ template policy.
+
+#let misq(
+ title: [Untitled],
+ abstract: none,
+ keywords: (),
+ paragraph-style: "indent", // "indent" (first-line, no extra spacing) or "block" (no indent, extra spacing)
+ body
+) = {
+
+ // --- Page geometry (PAGE-01, PAGE-02) ---
+ // US Letter: 8.5" x 11"
+ // Margins: 1" all sides → 6.5" text width, 9" text height
+ // Matches LaTeX: textwidth 6.5in, textheight 9in
+ set page(
+ paper: "us-letter",
+ margin: (x: 1in, top: 1in, bottom: 1in),
+ numbering: "1",
+ number-align: center + bottom, // PAGE-03: centered footer page numbers
+ )
+
+ // --- Font (TYPO-01) ---
+ // Times New Roman is required; Times is the macOS/Linux fallback
+ set text(font: ("Times New Roman", "Times"), size: 12pt)
+
+ // --- Body paragraph spacing (TYPO-02) ---
+ // Double-spaced: visually equivalent to LaTeX \baselinestretch{2.0}
+ // Calibrated empirically in Phase 1: leading = 1.85em, spacing = 1.85em
+ set par(justify: true, leading: 1.85em, spacing: 1.85em)
+
+ // --- Paragraph style toggle ---
+ // "indent": first-line indent (LaTeX convention), no extra between-paragraph spacing
+ // "block": no indent, extra spacing between paragraphs (Word convention)
+ // NOTE: set rules must be at show-rule scope to propagate to body content.
+ // Using set/show inside an if-block scopes them to that block only.
+ // `all: true` is required so that paragraphs immediately following headings also
+ // receive the first-line indent. Without `all: true`, Typst skips the indent on
+ // the first paragraph after a heading (Typst's default CSS-like behavior), which
+ // does NOT match MISQ's requirement of indenting every paragraph including those
+ // that follow section headings.
+ set par(first-line-indent: (amount: if paragraph-style == "indent" { 0.5in } else { 0pt }, all: true))
+ set par(spacing: if paragraph-style == "block" { 2.5em } else { 1.85em })
+
+ // --- Citation style (CITE-03) ---
+ // Auto-apply bundled APA 7th CSL so authors call #bibliography() with no style: needed.
+ // Authors may override: #bibliography("refs.bib", style: "chicago-author-date")
+ set bibliography(style: "apa.csl")
+
+ // --- Bibliography formatting (TYPO-04, STRC-03) ---
+ // Single-spacing + REFERENCES heading formatting.
+ // HOW hanging indent works: The bundled apa.csl is an unmodified upstream APA 7th
+ // edition CSL file. It has hanging-indent="true", which means the CSL itself delivers
+ // the 0.5-inch hanging indent natively. No Typst-level hanging-indent code is needed.
+ // WHAT this show rule does: The show rule handles only two concerns:
+ // 1. Single-spacing — overrides document-level double-spacing for bibliography
+ // entries via par(leading: 0.65em, spacing: 0.65em).
+ // 2. REFERENCES heading formatting (STRC-03) — centered, bold, uppercase.
+ // WHY single show rule: Multiple transformational show rules for the same element
+ // (bibliography) cause the last rule to overwrite all earlier ones. All bibliography
+ // formatting is combined here in one rule.
+ show bibliography: it => {
+ set par(leading: 0.65em, spacing: 0.65em)
+ // STRC-03: Auto-format heading — centered, bold, uppercase
+ show heading: it_h => align(center, block(
+ above: 1.85em,
+ below: 1.85em,
+ {
+ set text(weight: "bold", size: 12pt)
+ upper(it_h.body)
+ }
+ ))
+ it
+ }
+
+ // --- Single-spacing for figures and tables (TYPO-05) ---
+ // Captions and figure/table content rendered at single-spacing (same as bibliography).
+ // HOW the scoping works: `show figure: set par(...)` is a set rule attached to a
+ // show rule. The par() settings (leading/spacing) apply only within figure content
+ // (captions and body), not globally to the document. This is distinct from a bare
+ // `set par(...)` which would apply to all subsequent content in scope. The show rule
+ // creates a scoped styling context that reverts to document-level par settings after
+ // the figure closes.
+ show figure: set par(leading: 0.65em, spacing: 0.65em)
+
+ // --- Heading numbering (HEAD-04) ---
+ // Hierarchical numbering pattern: "1", "1.1", "1.1.1"
+ // Using "1.1" (no trailing dot) to avoid trailing period on level-1 display ("1." → "1")
+ set heading(numbering: "1.1")
+
+ // --- Heading show rules (HEAD-01, HEAD-02, HEAD-03) ---
+ // All levels: bold, 12pt, uniform spacing above/below
+ // IMPORTANT: counter(heading).display(it.numbering) reconstructs the number
+ // because full transformational show rules bypass default heading number rendering.
+ // See RESEARCH.md Pitfall 1.
+
+ // Level 1: centered, uppercase, bold, 12pt, numbered (1, 2, 3, ...)
+ show heading.where(level: 1): it => align(center, block(
+ above: 1.85em,
+ below: 1.85em,
+ {
+ set text(weight: "bold", size: 12pt)
+ if it.numbering != none {
+ counter(heading).display(it.numbering)
+ h(0.5em)
+ }
+ upper(it.body)
+ }
+ ))
+
+ // Level 2: centered, bold, 12pt, numbered (1.1, 1.2, ...) — no uppercase
+ show heading.where(level: 2): it => align(center, block(
+ above: 1.85em,
+ below: 1.85em,
+ {
+ set text(weight: "bold", size: 12pt)
+ if it.numbering != none {
+ counter(heading).display(it.numbering)
+ h(0.5em)
+ }
+ it.body
+ }
+ ))
+
+ // Level 3: left-aligned, bold, 12pt, numbered (1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...)
+ show heading.where(level: 3): it => block(
+ above: 1.85em,
+ below: 1.85em,
+ {
+ set text(weight: "bold", size: 12pt)
+ if it.numbering != none {
+ counter(heading).display(it.numbering)
+ h(0.5em)
+ }
+ it.body
+ }
+ )
+
+ // --- Front matter: title page (STRC-01) ---
+ // Title: bold and centered, original author casing (no auto-uppercase)
+ align(center, text(weight: "bold", title))
+ v(1em)
+
+ // --- Front matter: abstract (TYPO-03) ---
+ if abstract != none {
+ // Abstract label: centered and bold (updated from Phase 1's left-aligned)
+ align(center, text(weight: "bold")[Abstract])
+ linebreak()
+ // 1.5x spacing: calibrated in Phase 1 at 0.9em leading/spacing
+ // Scoped to abstract block only; body spacing is restored after this block
+ block({
+ set par(leading: 0.9em, spacing: 0.9em)
+ abstract
+ })
+ parbreak()
+ }
+
+ // --- Front matter: keywords ---
+ if keywords.len() > 0 {
+ block({
+ set par(first-line-indent: 0pt)
+ text(weight: "bold")[Keywords: ]
+ for (i, k) in keywords.enumerate() {
+ k
+ if i < keywords.len() - 1 { [, ] }
+ }
+ })
+ parbreak()
+ }
+
+ // --- Page break (STRC-02) ---
+ // Force Introduction to start at top of page 2
+ // weak: true avoids blank page if the page is already empty
+ pagebreak(weak: true)
+
+ // --- Body content ---
+ body
+}
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/main.typ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/main.typ
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e1dda76775
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/main.typ
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+// template/main.typ — Example document for the MISQ Typst template
+//
+// This file demonstrates all features of the MISQ submission template.
+// Replace the title, abstract, keywords, and body text with your own manuscript.
+// See misq.typ for configuration options (e.g., paragraph-style).
+
+#import "@preview/magnificent-misq:0.1.0": misq
+
+#show: misq.with(
+ title: [Digital Transformation and Organizational Resilience: A Longitudinal Study of Enterprise Information Systems Adoption],
+ abstract: [
+ Digital transformation has emerged as a critical strategic imperative for organizations seeking to maintain competitive advantage in increasingly turbulent environments. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and institutional theory, this study examines how enterprise information systems adoption shapes organizational resilience over time. We conducted a longitudinal field study spanning three years across twelve organizations in the financial services and healthcare sectors. Our findings reveal that resilience outcomes depend not merely on the technical capabilities of adopted systems, but on the degree to which organizations develop complementary routines for sensing environmental changes and reconfiguring digital resources in response. We identify three distinct adoption trajectories and demonstrate that organizations following an adaptive trajectory achieve significantly higher resilience scores than those following compliance-driven or innovation-avoidance trajectories. Theoretical and practical implications for IS researchers and executives are discussed.
+ ],
+ keywords: ("digital transformation", "organizational resilience", "enterprise systems", "dynamic capabilities", "longitudinal study"),
+ paragraph-style: "indent",
+)
+
+= Introduction
+
+Information systems researchers have long recognized that technology adoption is not a discrete event but an ongoing organizational process @orlikowski1992duality. As enterprises invest heavily in digital transformation initiatives, questions about how these investments translate into durable organizational capabilities remain inadequately answered. The extant literature has tended to examine adoption outcomes at a single point in time, obscuring the dynamic processes through which organizations develop—or fail to develop—resilience in response to environmental disruption.
+
+This study addresses that gap by examining how the adoption trajectory of enterprise information systems shapes organizational resilience over a three-year period. We argue, following #cite(, form: "prose"), that mixed-methods longitudinal designs are particularly well-suited to this kind of process-level inquiry. Our research context—the financial services and healthcare sectors—was chosen because both industries face simultaneous pressures from regulatory change, competitive disruption, and operational complexity @brown2023fault @gupta2018economic.
+
+The remainder of this paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 reviews the theoretical foundations and prior research. Section 3 describes the research methodology. Section 4 presents the findings. Section 5 discusses the theoretical and practical implications, and Section 6 concludes.
+
+= Literature Review
+
+Prior research on digital transformation spans multiple theoretical traditions. This section reviews the two bodies of work most relevant to our study: dynamic capabilities theory and institutional accounts of technology adoption.
+
+== Theoretical Background
+
+Dynamic capabilities theory holds that competitive advantage accrues to firms that can sense environmental shifts, seize emerging opportunities, and reconfigure existing resources @orlikowski1992duality. In an information systems context, digital assets figure prominently in each of these three microfoundations. Sensing capabilities are augmented by analytics and monitoring systems; seizing capabilities are enabled by platform flexibility; and reconfiguring capabilities depend on the modularity and interoperability of existing technology infrastructure.
+
+Institutional theory offers a complementary perspective. Organizations adopt enterprise systems not only to improve operational performance but also to signal legitimacy to external stakeholders. As #cite(, form: "prose") demonstrate in the context of consumer technology, behavioral intentions are shaped by social influence and facilitating conditions as much as by perceived usefulness—a dynamic that operates with similar force in organizational adoption contexts.
+
+=== Key Constructs
+
+We operationalize organizational resilience as the capacity to absorb disruption while maintaining continuous operations and subsequently adapting structural routines in response to new environmental demands. This definition integrates engineering resilience (absorption) and ecological resilience (adaptation) traditions from the broader management literature. Digital transformation capability is defined as the extent to which an organization has developed routines for deploying, extending, and reconfiguring digital resources in pursuit of strategic objectives.
+
+== Prior Research
+
+Earlier IS adoption research established the foundational relationship between system quality and user satisfaction @gupta2018economic. Subsequent work extended these findings to enterprise-level outcomes, demonstrating that system adoption decisions have organization-wide performance consequences that unfold over multi-year periods. Our study builds on this stream by introducing organizational resilience as a key outcome variable and by examining how adoption trajectory—rather than adoption status alone—mediates the relationship between enterprise system investment and resilience outcomes.
+
+= Methodology
+
+This study employed a longitudinal multiple-case design. Data were collected at three points in time (T1, T2, T3) separated by twelve-month intervals across twelve organizations. At each time point, we administered a structured survey instrument, conducted semi-structured interviews with senior IS executives, and extracted archival records from each organization's enterprise system logs.
+
+The sample was selected using theoretical sampling criteria: organizations had to have initiated a major enterprise system adoption project within the six months preceding T1, operate in either financial services or healthcare, and employ more than 500 full-time staff. These criteria yielded a diverse sample spanning community banks, regional insurers, outpatient clinics, and hospital networks. @fig:design illustrates the overall research design, and @tab:stats summarizes the key descriptive statistics for the sample.
+
+#figure(
+ rect(width: 4.5in, height: 2.25in, fill: luma(230)),
+ caption: [
+ Longitudinal research design. Each organization was observed at three time points
+ (T1, T2, T3) separated by twelve-month intervals. Quantitative surveys and
+ qualitative interviews were conducted at each time point.
+ ]
+)
+
+#figure(
+ table(
+ columns: (2.5fr, 1fr, 1fr),
+ table.header(
+ [Variable], [Mean], [SD],
+ ),
+ [Digital transformation capability], [3.84], [0.72],
+ [Organizational resilience (T3)], [4.12], [0.65],
+ [Enterprise system maturity], [3.97], [0.81],
+ [Environmental uncertainty], [4.23], [0.58],
+ ),
+ caption: [Descriptive statistics for key study variables (n = 12 organizations, 847 respondents).]
+)
+
+= Discussion
+
+Our findings extend dynamic capabilities theory by identifying adoption trajectory as an important contingency variable that moderates the relationship between enterprise system investment and resilience outcomes. Organizations that followed an adaptive trajectory—characterized by iterative experimentation and routine reconfiguration—achieved significantly higher resilience at T3 than those following compliance-driven or innovation-avoidance trajectories. This finding resonates with earlier work establishing a link between IS capabilities and organizational agility @orlikowski1992duality.
+
+From a practical standpoint, these results suggest that executives should attend not only to the selection and implementation of enterprise systems but to the organizational routines that govern ongoing system use and adaptation. The adoption journey matters as much as the adoption decision. As #cite(, form: "prose") observe, technology-enabled outcomes are shaped by organizational and social factors that are often underestimated in technology investment decisions. Future research should examine whether the trajectory patterns identified here generalize beyond the financial services and healthcare sectors, and whether they persist over longer time horizons than the three years examined in this study.
+
+#pagebreak()
+
+#bibliography("references.bib", title: "References")
+
+#pagebreak()
+
+// NOTE: The appendix heading is set manually rather than using = APPENDIX.
+// Using a level-1 heading would produce "5 APPENDIX" due to auto-numbering.
+// Authors should use the pattern below to achieve a centered bold heading without a number.
+#align(center, text(weight: "bold", size: 12pt)[APPENDIX])
+
+This appendix provides supplementary documentation of the survey instrument administered at each time point. The survey consisted of 42 items organized into six scales corresponding to the key constructs described in Section 2. All items were measured on a seven-point Likert scale anchored at 1 ("Strongly Disagree") and 7 ("Strongly Agree"). Scale reliability estimates (Cronbach's alpha) exceeded 0.80 for all constructs.
+
+Authors requiring multiple appendices should repeat this pattern with distinct headings ("APPENDIX A," "APPENDIX B," etc.) each preceded by a `#pagebreak()` call.
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/references.bib b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/references.bib
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0ed4dcdece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/template/references.bib
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+@article{orlikowski1992duality,
+ title={The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations},
+ author={Orlikowski, Wanda J},
+ journal={Organization Science},
+ volume={3},
+ number={3},
+ pages={398--427},
+ year={1992},
+ publisher={INFORMS}
+}
+@article{brown2023fault,
+ title={The fault in our stars: {M}olecular genetics and information technology use},
+ author={Brown, Susan A and Sias, Richard W},
+ journal={MIS Quarterly},
+ volume={47},
+ number={2},
+ pages={483--510},
+ year={2023},
+ publisher={Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota}
+}
+@article{gupta2018economic,
+ title={Economic Experiments in Information Systems},
+ author={Gupta, Alok and Kannan, Karthik and Sanyal, Pallab},
+ journal={MIS Quarterly},
+ volume={42},
+ number={2},
+ pages={595--606},
+ year={2018},
+ publisher={Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota}
+}
+@book{creswell2017research,
+ title={Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches},
+ author={Creswell, John W and Creswell, J David},
+ year={2017},
+ edition={5},
+ publisher={SAGE Publications},
+ address={Thousand Oaks, CA}
+}
+@inproceedings{venkatesh2012consumer,
+ title={Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory},
+ author={Venkatesh, Viswanath and Thong, James Y L and Xu, Xin},
+ booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems},
+ year={2012},
+ pages={1--18},
+ organization={Association for Information Systems},
+ address={Orlando, FL}
+}
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/thumbnail.png b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/thumbnail.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..98002f7d47
Binary files /dev/null and b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/thumbnail.png differ
diff --git a/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/typst.toml b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/typst.toml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..273260ef59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/preview/magnificent-misq/0.1.0/typst.toml
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+[package]
+name = "magnificent-misq"
+version = "0.1.0"
+entrypoint = "misq.typ"
+authors = ["Ryan Schuetzler "]
+license = "MIT"
+description = "A Typst template for MIS Quarterly manuscript submissions"
+keywords = [
+ "MISQ",
+ "MIS Quarterly",
+ "academic",
+ "management information systems",
+ "APA",
+ "IS research"
+]
+categories = ["paper"]
+disciplines = ["computer-science"]
+exclude = ["template/main.pdf"]
+
+[template]
+path = "template"
+entrypoint = "main.typ"
+thumbnail = "thumbnail.png"