Consider using an enum for the quantity name. See: `info_provider.rs`

[younies]

Problem

1. UnitQuantity struct: Consider using an enum for the quantity name.

pub struct UnitQuantity<'data> {
// TODO: Consider using an enum for the quantity name.
pub quantity: Cow<'data, str>,
}

Proposed Solution

1. Replace quantity field with an enum.

Feedback or suggestions are welcome.

[younies]

@sffc, @Manishearth , @robertbastian

In order to use an enum for the quantity, this means that we will hardcode this enum. Or, we can write a macro to generate it.

what do you think ?

[sffc]

It should be an open enum, similar to how we handle unicode property names. That is, not an enum but instead a newtype wrapper around either u8 or u16 depending on how much room we need, with a FromStr impl.

[younies]

@Manishearth @sffc @younies LGTM @sffc suggestion