You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
**Root cause hypothesis:** The match codegen for monomorphized built-in generic types uses a different variant ordering than construction. The `?` operator avoids this because it uses a direct `icmp eq` rather than a `switch`.
64
64
65
-
-[] Reproduce with Journey 12's code — AOT returns 144 instead of 33
66
-
-[] Write targeted test: `Option<int>` construction + match, compare eval vs AOT
-[ ] All 12 journeys: `./scripts/dual-exec-verify.sh` — 0 mismatches
180
-
-[] No new regressions: `./test-all.sh` green
181
-
-[]`./clippy-all.sh` green
180
+
-[x] No new regressions: `./test-all.sh` green
181
+
-[x]`./clippy-all.sh` green
182
182
183
183
**Exit Criteria:** All 4 critical bugs fixed. `./scripts/dual-exec-verify.sh` runs all 12 journey programs through both eval and AOT, producing 0 mismatches. No test regressions.
0 commit comments