Errata-Specific Test Cases #59
Description
I can see from the closed issues and the RFC errata history that the "'" character is allowed in literals now. However, I didn't realise that initially, and was quite confused as to why the second test case in spec-examples.json included what I thought to be an invalid literal. Obviously I've tracked that down, but would it be worth making this more obvious?
One way to do so might be to remove that test from the spec-examples.json file (it doesn't actually appear in the RFC itself) and creating a small new test case file (something like spec-errata-examples.json perhaps) which would include any cases which reflect changes to the spec? That would potentially make it clearer for example that the spec has changed, and also point people in the direction of checking errata during implementation (yes, I know I should anyway, but it's not always glaringly obvious).