-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
302 lines (279 loc) · 14.4 KB
/
Copy pathcodex-review-post.yml
File metadata and controls
302 lines (279 loc) · 14.4 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
name: Codex Review
# Stage 2 of the two-stage Codex PR review.
#
# Triggered by the completion of Stage 1 (codex-review.yml) via `workflow_run`,
# so it runs in the BASE repository context WITH access to secrets — even for
# fork PRs. It NEVER checks out PR code: it only reads the pre-computed diff
# artifact from Stage 1, so untrusted fork code can never execute next to the
# OpenAI key. That structural guarantee is what makes reviewing fork PRs safe.
#
# Residual risk: Codex still reads the diff as *data*, so a prompt-injection
# payload in the diff could in principle try to coax the key into a review
# comment (the action keeps the key behind a proxy, but read-only Codex can reach
# process memory). Use a scoped, low-limit OPENAI_API_KEY for this workflow.
on:
workflow_run:
workflows: ["Codex Review (collect diff)"]
types: [completed]
permissions:
contents: read
concurrency:
# Serialize per PR source (repo + branch), not per SHA, so a newer push cancels
# an in-flight older review instead of racing it to post stale findings.
group: codex-review-post-${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name }}-${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_branch }}
cancel-in-progress: true
jobs:
review:
if: github.event.workflow_run.conclusion == 'success'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
actions: read # download-artifact needs this to read another run's artifact
pull-requests: write # covers PR review comments AND the PR conversation comment
steps:
- name: Download Stage 1 diff artifact
uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
with:
name: codex-review-payload
path: codex-payload
run-id: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.id }}
github-token: ${{ github.token }}
- name: Resolve and verify PR
id: pr
uses: actions/github-script@v7
env:
RUN_HEAD_SHA: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }}
with:
github-token: ${{ github.token }}
script: |
const fs = require('fs');
const raw = fs.readFileSync('codex-payload/pr-number.txt', 'utf8').trim();
if (!/^\d+$/.test(raw)) {
core.setFailed(`Invalid PR number in artifact: "${raw}"`);
return;
}
const pull_number = Number(raw);
const { owner, repo } = context.repo;
const { data: pr } = await github.rest.pulls.get({ owner, repo, pull_number });
// Bind the artifact to a real PR: the triggering run's head_sha is set by
// GitHub (not the fork), so requiring it to equal the PR head prevents a
// tampered artifact from redirecting the review onto an unrelated PR.
if (pr.head.sha !== process.env.RUN_HEAD_SHA) {
core.setFailed(
`PR #${pull_number} head ${pr.head.sha} != run head ${process.env.RUN_HEAD_SHA}; refusing to post.`,
);
return;
}
// Re-apply Stage 1's gate against the PR's *current* state: it may have
// been closed or converted to draft since the diff was collected. Keeps
// posting behavior consistent with what gets reviewed.
if (pr.state !== 'open' || pr.draft || pr.user?.type === 'Bot') {
core.notice(`PR #${pull_number} is not an open, ready, human PR; skipping review.`);
core.setOutput('skip', 'true');
return;
}
core.setOutput('skip', 'false');
core.setOutput('number', String(pull_number));
- name: Prepare working directory
if: steps.pr.outputs.skip != 'true'
run: |
set -euo pipefail
# codex-action runs `codex exec --cd <working-directory>`; give it a valid
# (empty) git repo containing ONLY the diff — never any PR code.
cd codex-payload
# Allow an empty diff (e.g. a push reverted all changes) so the post step
# still clears stale prior findings; only a missing file is an error.
test -f pr.diff || { echo "pr.diff missing"; exit 1; }
git init -q
- name: Run Codex on the diff
id: run_codex
if: steps.pr.outputs.skip != 'true'
# Pinned to the v1 commit SHA: this privileged job holds OPENAI_API_KEY, so a
# moved/compromised tag must not silently change what runs here.
uses: openai/codex-action@52fe01ec70a42f454c9d2ebd47598f9fd6893d56 # v1
with:
openai-api-key: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
# This job reviews ALL PRs incl. forks; the action's default write-access
# gate would otherwise reject fork/non-collaborator authors. Safe to open
# here because security comes from this job never checking out PR code
# (only the diff artifact), not from the actor allowlist.
allow-users: "*"
model: gpt-5.5
effort: xhigh
sandbox: read-only
working-directory: codex-payload
output-schema: |
{
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"summary": { "type": "string" },
"findings": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"path": { "type": "string" },
"line": { "type": "integer" },
"severity": { "type": "string", "enum": ["blocking", "consider"] },
"comment": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["path", "line", "severity", "comment"]
}
}
},
"required": ["summary", "findings"]
}
prompt: |
You are reviewing a pull request in ${{ github.repository }}.
The complete set of changes is the unified diff in the file `pr.diff` in
your working directory (run `cat pr.diff`). It is a `git diff` of
base...head. Review ONLY those changes. Report high-signal findings only.
Correctness & safety:
- logic errors, unhandled edge cases, broken assumptions
- security vulnerabilities
- data loss, concurrency hazards, resource leaks
Design & code quality:
- the soundness of the overall approach, not just line-level bugs
- elegance: is there a simpler, cleaner way to achieve the same result?
- abstraction: prefer the most general clean abstraction that fits the problem,
without over-engineering for cases that don't exist
- redundancy: flag duplicated logic, dead code, and anything that violates DRY
Skip pure formatting and style nits.
Report at most the 5 most important findings. Consolidate an issue that
recurs in several places into one finding at the most representative location.
Output JSON matching the provided schema:
- `summary`: one or two sentences on the PR overall. If there are no real
issues, set summary to "No issues found." and findings to [].
- `findings[].path`: repository-relative file path, exactly as it appears in
the diff (the path after `+++ b/`).
- `findings[].line`: the line number in the NEW (post-change) version of the
file. It MUST be a line the PR adds or modifies.
- `findings[].severity`: "blocking" or "consider".
- `findings[].comment`: markdown review comment with a short code snippet and a
concrete fix.
- name: Post inline review
if: steps.pr.outputs.skip != 'true' && steps.run_codex.outputs.final-message != ''
uses: actions/github-script@v7
env:
CODEX_RESULT: ${{ steps.run_codex.outputs.final-message }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.pr.outputs.number }}
REVIEWED_SHA: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }}
with:
github-token: ${{ github.token }}
script: |
const { owner, repo } = context.repo;
const pull_number = Number(process.env.PR_NUMBER);
const SUMMARY_MARKER = '<!-- codex-review-summary -->';
const INLINE_MARKER = '<!-- codex-review-inline -->';
const MAX_COMMENTS = 5;
const BOT = 'github-actions[bot]'; // only ever touch comments we authored
// Parse Codex JSON. With --output-schema the result is already pure JSON,
// and its findings may contain fenced code blocks, so never grab an inner
// fence: parse the whole string first, then a fence wrapping the whole
// string, then fall back to the outermost braces.
function parseResult(raw) {
if (!raw) return null;
const tryParse = (s) => { try { return JSON.parse(s); } catch { return null; } };
const trimmed = raw.trim();
let out = tryParse(trimmed);
if (out) return out;
const fence = trimmed.match(/^```(?:json)?\s*\n?([\s\S]*?)\n?```$/);
if (fence) { out = tryParse(fence[1].trim()); if (out) return out; }
const a = trimmed.indexOf('{'), b = trimmed.lastIndexOf('}');
if (a !== -1 && b > a) return tryParse(trimmed.slice(a, b + 1));
return null;
}
const result = parseResult(process.env.CODEX_RESULT);
if (!result) { core.setFailed('Could not parse Codex output as JSON.'); return; }
const summary = (result.summary || '').trim();
const findings = (Array.isArray(result.findings) ? result.findings : [])
.slice(0, MAX_COMMENTS);
// Build the set of (path -> commentable new-file line numbers) from the diff.
const pr = await github.rest.pulls.get({ owner, repo, pull_number });
const headSha = pr.data.head.sha;
// If the PR advanced past the commit we reviewed, a newer run is already
// handling the new head — don't post findings generated from a stale diff.
if (headSha !== process.env.REVIEWED_SHA) {
core.notice(`PR head moved ${process.env.REVIEWED_SHA} -> ${headSha}; skipping stale review.`);
return;
}
const files = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listFiles, {
owner, repo, pull_number, per_page: 100,
});
const commentable = new Map();
for (const f of files) {
if (!f.patch) continue;
const lines = new Set();
let newLine = 0;
for (const ln of f.patch.split('\n')) {
const h = ln.match(/^@@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(?:,\d+)? @@/);
if (h) { newLine = parseInt(h[1], 10); continue; }
if (ln.startsWith('\\')) continue; // "\ No newline at end of file"
if (ln.startsWith('+')) { lines.add(newLine); newLine++; }
else if (ln.startsWith('-')) { /* removed line, no new-side number */ }
else { newLine++; } // context line
}
commentable.set(f.filename, lines);
}
// Split findings into inline-able vs. orphans (lines not in the diff).
const inline = [], orphans = [];
for (const fnd of findings) {
const sev = (fnd.severity || 'consider').toUpperCase();
const set = commentable.get(fnd.path);
if (set && set.has(fnd.line)) {
inline.push({
path: fnd.path, line: fnd.line, side: 'RIGHT',
body: `${INLINE_MARKER}\n**${sev}** ${fnd.comment}`,
});
} else {
orphans.push({ ...fnd, sev });
}
}
// Always clear our prior inline comments first, so findings resolved in a
// later push disappear even when this run produces no inline comments.
try {
const prior = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviewComments, {
owner, repo, pull_number, per_page: 100,
});
for (const c of prior) {
if (c.user?.login === BOT && c.body && c.body.includes(INLINE_MARKER)) {
try { await github.rest.pulls.deleteReviewComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: c.id }); }
catch {}
}
}
} catch (e) { core.warning(`Could not clean prior inline comments: ${e.message}`); }
// Post this run's inline comments. If it fails, fold them into the summary.
let inlinePosted = false;
if (inline.length) {
try {
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
owner, repo, pull_number, commit_id: headSha,
event: 'COMMENT', comments: inline,
});
inlinePosted = true;
} catch (err) {
core.warning(`Inline review failed (${err.status || ''}); folding into the summary.`);
}
}
// Build the rolling summary comment.
const leftover = inlinePosted
? orphans
: findings.map(f => ({ ...f, sev: (f.severity || 'consider').toUpperCase() }));
let body = `${SUMMARY_MARKER}\n### Codex review\n\n` +
(summary || (findings.length ? 'See inline comments.' : 'No issues found.'));
if (leftover.length) {
body += `\n\n**${inlinePosted ? 'Findings not on changed lines' : 'Findings'}:**\n`;
for (const o of leftover) body += `\n- \`${o.path}:${o.line}\` **${o.sev}** ${o.comment}`;
}
// Upsert one rolling summary comment instead of stacking on each push.
const comments = await github.paginate(github.rest.issues.listComments, {
owner, repo, issue_number: pull_number, per_page: 100,
});
const existing = comments.find(c => c.user?.login === BOT && c.body && c.body.includes(SUMMARY_MARKER));
if (existing) {
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: existing.id, body });
} else {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner, repo, issue_number: pull_number, body });
}