wrong paper

[Chuan1937]

The definitions of FP and FN are wrong and different from those in mainstream PhaseNet articles. Also, removing the mean after bandpass filtering is a repetitive operation in principle and is unnecessary.

And the model effect can't achieve similar results to the paper. Does the author have any explanation?

[omarmohamed15]

@Chuan1937

We are not using the definitions of FP and FN from the PhaseNet paper. Our paper clearly states our definitions; please refer to those for clarification.

Regarding mean removal, please check the relevant line in the code and review or adjust it if necessary.

Also, I'm not sure which dataset you're referring to when you mention not getting the same results. We've tested several datasets, so please be more specific so we can address the issue properly.

[Chuan1937]

Phasenet is a pioneer in the industry, and its definition of indicators has influenced most subsequent articles. Why don't you do this?