Skip to content

Is there a redundant addition of positional encoding in the IterBlock section? #28

@ackbar03

Description

@ackbar03

Hi,

I see that an additional positional encoding is added in the forward part of the IterBlock module.

https://github.com/uw-ipd/RoseTTAFold2/blob/main/network/Track_module.py#L544C1-L550C47

def forward(self, msa, pair, R_in, T_in, xyz, state, idx, symmids, symmsub_in, symmsub, symmRs, symmmeta, use_checkpoint=False, topk=0, crop=-1):
        #rbf_feat = rbf(torch.cdist(xyz[:,:,1,:], xyz[:,:,1,:])) + self.pos(idx)
        O,L = pair.shape[:2]
        xyzfull = xyz.view(1,O*L,3,3)
        rbf_feat = rbf(
            torch.cdist(xyzfull[:,:,1,:], xyzfull[:,:L,1,:])
        ).reshape(O,L,L,-1) + self.pos(idx, O)

This seems redundant since rbf_feat is then added to the variable pair, which already contains the positional encoding from the MSA_emb module.

I know that the model is already trained with this in place, so it probably doesn't matter, but I just wanted to check if my interpretation is correct? I also noticed that the corresponding section for this in RFDiffusion has been modified so there is no additional positional encoding added.

Thanks

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions