Any way to improve v2ray's traffic processing efficiency?

[arinc9]

Which version of V2Ray are you using?

v5.29.2

What abnormal phenomenon do you see?

On Qualcomm IPQ4019 SoC which has a quad-core 717 MHz processor, v2ray performs as shown in the screenshots. Is there any way to improve the efficiency of v2ray's traffic processing so that we see more throughput?

Please attach your configuration

Server configuration:

{
  "log": {
    "level": "info"
  },
  "inbounds": [
    {
      "port": port,
      "protocol": "vmess",
      "settings": {
        "clients": [
          {
            "id": "UUID"
          }
        ]
      },
      "streamSettings": {
        "sockopt": {
          "mptcp": true
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "outbounds": [
    {
      "protocol": "freedom"
    }
  ]
}

Client configuration:

{
  "inbounds": [
    {
      "port": 12345,
      "listen": "127.0.0.1",
      "protocol": "dokodemo-door",
      "settings": {
        "network": "tcp,udp",
        "followRedirect": true
      },
      "streamSettings": {
        "sockopt": {
          "tproxy": "tproxy"
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "outbounds": [
    {
      "protocol": "vmess",
      "settings": {
        "vnext": [
          {
            "address": "server",
            "port": port,
            "users": [
              {
                "id": "UUID",
                "security": "zero"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "streamSettings": {
        "sockopt": {
          "mptcp": true
        }
      },
      "mux": {
        "enabled": true,
        "concurrency": 8
      }
    }
  ]
}

[database64128]

Is there any way to improve the efficiency of v2ray's traffic processing so that we see more throughput?

No, it would take a full rewrite to make V2Ray handle network traffic more efficiently. If what you want is a generic proxy program that supports MPTCP, shadowsocks-go is a project I wrote and maintain that focuses on performance.

[arinc9]

@database64128 thanks for the referral. I see that this programme is about 5 times more efficient than v2ray-core. We'll prefer to use this instead of v2ray-core. I couldn't make the shadowsocks-none server object use MPTCP though. I'll create an issue for that.