Skip to content

Sensible library categories #57

@Cellane

Description

@Cellane

Seeing as the list is nicely growing both in terms of entries and in terms of popularity1 (thank you! 🙇 ✨), I think it’s time to start thinking about splitting the list of Vapor libraries into relevant categories. And since I’m notoriously bad at making creative decisions like these myself, I’d love to invite the community to participate in the process of decision-making.

In your opinion, what sort of categories would reasonably separate the libraries currently present on the list, and hopefully not require too many changes in the future?

From my point of view, the ideal situation would look like this:

  • categories are distinct enough that each library can without any reasonable doubt belong to one category only;
  • categories are intuitive enough that if I’m searching for a solution of a particular problem, I should immediately know which category will likely contain libraries solving my problem just by looking at the category list in the table of contents;
  • categories are generic enough to describe not only current state of the list, but hopefully also future state.

I’d love to hear what other people think and in a week or two’s time, make a final decision based on the feedback I receive by then (if any).

Footnotes

  1. It’s only a bit sad that my PR (Add Vapor sindresorhus/awesome#1313) to have Awesome Vapor added to the list of Awesome lists was still not merged 😢

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions