Change the name of repository to follow new Redis licensing.

[naufalfachrian]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Redis is now adopting dual source-available licensing. This also updated requirements on the use of “Redis” in product names. Here's the full article.

Describe the solution you'd like

• Rename the repository to follow updated requirements on the use of "Redis" in product names.

Describe alternatives you've considered

• Replace Redis functionality with open-source fork, like redict.

Additional context

• None

[0xTim]

So looking at this I don't believe we need to rename it. We don't fall foul of the license since this is a Redis client and we're not shipping any Redis code or server functionality. I would be interested to see what other 3rd party clients do