Add option for VRL function parse_key_value to specify resulting key case

[alexeynl]

A note for the community

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Use Cases

Lets we have the following strings:

key1=value1,key2=value2
Key1=value1,Key2=value2

In current implementation using

result = parse_key_value(string)

i need check both

result.key1
result.Key1

for value.

Attempted Solutions

No response

Proposal

If i have keys in key value string contains in different cases i need option to specify case of resulting field names like this:

result = parse_key_value(string, key_case: "low")

result.key1 must return value1 for both string:

key1=value1,key2=value2
Key1=value1,Key2=value2

References

No response

Version

No response

[pront]

Hello, can you share a playground example?

[alexeynl]

Hello, can you share a playground example?

Please check:

https://playground.vrl.dev/?state=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

[JakubOnderka]

@alexeynl

You can normalize keys by this simple approach:

ldap_dn = map_keys(ldap_dn, recursive: true) -> |key| { downcase(key) }

[alexeynl]

@alexeynl

You can normalize keys by this simple approach:

ldap_dn = map_keys(ldap_dn, recursive: true) -> |key| { downcase(key) }

This works. Thank you!

I have tried similar with for_each but no luck...