|
| 1 | +# CMW Examples Implementation Summary |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Overview |
| 4 | +This implementation addresses issue #24 "Example CMW Files" by providing comprehensive example files for testing and development with RATSD. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## Files Created |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +### Example CMW Files |
| 9 | +1. **`basic-mock-tsm.json`** - Minimal mock TSM attester example |
| 10 | +2. **`mock-tsm-with-privilege.json`** - Mock TSM with privilege level configuration |
| 11 | +3. **`tsm-report-basic.json`** - Basic TSM report attester example |
| 12 | +4. **`multi-attester.json`** - Multi-attester example with both mock-tsm and tsm-report |
| 13 | +5. **`tsm-cbor-format.json`** - TSM report using CBOR content type |
| 14 | +6. **`privilege-level-3.json`** - Example showing maximum privilege level |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Documentation and Testing |
| 17 | +7. **`README.md`** - Comprehensive documentation explaining CMW structure, usage, and examples |
| 18 | +8. **`test-examples.sh`** - Validation script to test JSON validity, CMW structure, and base64 encoding |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Technical Implementation Details |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +### CMW Structure Compliance |
| 23 | +- All examples follow the standard CMW collection format with `__cmwc_t` tag |
| 24 | +- Proper content type specifications for each attester type |
| 25 | +- Valid base64 encoding for `auxblob` and `outblob` fields |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### Attester Coverage |
| 28 | +- **Mock TSM**: JSON format with configurable privilege levels |
| 29 | +- **TSM Report**: Both JSON and CBOR content types supported |
| 30 | +- **Multi-attester**: Demonstrates multiple attesters in single CMW |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +### Validation Features |
| 33 | +- JSON syntax validation |
| 34 | +- CMW structure verification |
| 35 | +- Base64 encoding validation |
| 36 | +- Automated testing script for continuous validation |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +## Usage Scenarios |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### Development Testing |
| 41 | +- Mock mode testing without real hardware |
| 42 | +- API endpoint validation |
| 43 | +- Integration testing scenarios |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +### Documentation Reference |
| 46 | +- Clear examples for developers |
| 47 | +- Format specification demonstrations |
| 48 | +- Best practices illustration |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +## Integration with RATSD |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### API Compatibility |
| 53 | +- Compatible with `/ratsd/chares` endpoint |
| 54 | +- Supports attester selection mechanisms |
| 55 | +- Works with both `list-options: all` and `list-options: selected` configurations |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +### Content Type Support |
| 58 | +- `application/vnd.veraison.configfs-tsm+json` |
| 59 | +- `application/vnd.veraison.configfs-tsm+cbor` |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +## Quality Assurance |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +### Testing |
| 64 | +- Automated validation script included |
| 65 | +- JSON syntax verification |
| 66 | +- CMW structure compliance checking |
| 67 | +- Base64 encoding validation |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +### Documentation |
| 70 | +- Comprehensive README with usage examples |
| 71 | +- Clear structure explanations |
| 72 | +- API integration examples |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +## Benefits for Project |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +1. **Developer Experience**: Easy to understand examples for new contributors |
| 77 | +2. **Testing Infrastructure**: Ready-to-use test data for development |
| 78 | +3. **Documentation**: Clear reference for CMW format implementation |
| 79 | +4. **Quality**: Automated validation ensures examples remain valid |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +## Future Enhancements |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +The examples are designed to be extensible for: |
| 84 | +- Additional attester types as they're implemented |
| 85 | +- More complex privilege level scenarios |
| 86 | +- Extended evidence format variations |
| 87 | +- Performance testing scenarios |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +This implementation provides a solid foundation for issue #24 and supports the broader mock mode functionality being developed in the project. |
0 commit comments