Skip to content

Regression test to check incremental timing analysis results/qor match full timing analysis during optimization #1310

Open
@vaughnbetz

Description

@vaughnbetz

Proposed Behaviour

We now have an incremental STA mode that is much faster for small changes in the optimizers. To confirm it always gets the same results as the full timing analysis, we should have one or two regtests on small circuits that check that we get the same results (should be identical placement output file, and identical routing output file) with incremental vs. full static timing analysis guiding the optimizers.

I think the best regtest would be two circuits, on the flagship architecture (https://github.com/verilog-to-routing/vtr-verilog-to-routing/blob/master/vtr_flow/arch/timing/k6_frac_N10_frac_chain_mem32K_40nm.xml).
Suggested circuits:
or1200.v (small, good for a quick test, put in vtr_reg_strong)
LU8PEEng.v (bigger, tests more blocks, put in vtr_reg_nightly)
Both are in https://github.com/verilog-to-routing/vtr-verilog-to-routing/blob/master/vtr_flow/benchmarks/verilog/LU8PEEng.v

The VTR developer guide has information on how to create a regtest, and starting with an existing regtest as a template would be a good idea. See https://docs.verilogtorouting.org/en/latest/dev/developing/#adding-tests

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

StaleVPRVPR FPGA Placement & Routing Tool

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions