Your intelligent assistant for questions, tasks, and workflows
OpenAgent is the primary universal agent in OpenCode that handles everything from simple questions to complex multi-step workflows. This guide explains how it works and how to get the most out of it.
- What is OpenAgent?
- How It Works
- The Two Paths
- The 6-Stage Workflow
- Session Management
- Dynamic Context Loading
- When OpenAgent Delegates
- Visual Workflows
- Tips for Your Workflow
OpenAgent is your universal coordinator that:
- ✅ Answers questions - Get explanations, comparisons, and guidance
- ✅ Executes general tasks - Create files, documentation, simple updates
- ✅ Coordinates workflows - Handles most general tasks directly, delegates to specialists when needed
- ✅ Preserves context - Remembers information across multiple steps
- ✅ Keeps you in control - Always asks for approval before taking action
Think of OpenAgent as a smart project coordinator who:
- Understands what you need
- Plans how to do it
- Asks for your approval
- Executes the plan (directly or via delegation)
- Confirms everything is done right
Note: For complex multi-file coding work, architecture analysis, or deep refactoring, use opencoder instead. OpenAgent is optimized for general tasks and coordination, while opencoder specializes in development work.
graph LR
A[You Ask] --> B{Question or Task?}
B -->|Question| C[Get Answer]
B -->|Task| D[See Plan]
D --> E[Approve Plan]
E --> F[Watch Execution]
F --> G[Confirm Done]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style B fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style F fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style G fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
For Questions: You ask → You get an answer For Tasks: You ask → See plan → Approve → Watch it happen → Confirm done
OpenAgent is a universal coordinator - it handles general tasks directly:
Capabilities: Answer questions, create documentation, simple code updates, workflow coordination, task planning, general research, file operations
Default: Execute directly for general tasks, fetch context files as needed (lazy), keep it simple, don't over-delegate
Delegate to opencoder when: Complex multi-file coding, architecture analysis, deep refactoring, pattern implementation
Delegate to specialists when: Testing needed (@tester), review needed (@reviewer), complex task breakdown (@task-manager), comprehensive documentation (@documentation)
This means OpenAgent is your go-to coordinator for general tasks and questions. For deep coding work, use opencoder.
OpenAgent has two different ways of working, depending on what you need:
graph TD
A[Ask Question] --> B[OpenAgent Analyzes]
B --> C[Provides Answer]
C --> D[Done!]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style B fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style C fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
When: You ask informational questions Examples:
- "What's the difference between REST and GraphQL?"
- "How do I use async/await in JavaScript?"
- "Explain what this code does"
What Happens: You get a direct, helpful answer. No approval needed.
graph TD
A[Request Task] --> B[OpenAgent Creates Plan]
B --> C[Shows You Plan]
C --> D{Approve?}
D -->|Yes| E[Executes Plan]
D -->|No| F[Revise or Cancel]
E --> G[Validates Results]
G --> H[Shows Summary]
H --> I{Satisfied?}
I -->|Yes| J[Cleanup if Needed]
I -->|No| K[Fix Issues]
J --> L[Done!]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style B fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style C fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style F fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style G fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style H fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style I fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style J fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style K fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style L fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
When: You want something done Examples:
- "Create a README for this project"
- "Build a user authentication system"
- "Refactor this code to use TypeScript"
What Happens:
- You see a plan
- You approve it
- OpenAgent executes it
- You confirm it's done right
When you request a task, OpenAgent follows a systematic 6-stage workflow:
graph TD
subgraph Stage1["Stage 1: Analyze"]
A1[Receive Request] --> A2[Assess Complexity]
A2 --> A3{Question or Task?}
end
subgraph Stage2["Stage 2: Approve"]
B1[Create Plan] --> B2[Present to User]
B2 --> B3[Wait for Approval]
end
subgraph Stage3["Stage 3: Execute"]
C1[Execute Steps] --> C2{Need Help?}
C2 -->|Yes| C3[Delegate to Specialist]
C2 -->|No| C4[Do It Directly]
C3 --> C5[Integrate Results]
C4 --> C5
end
subgraph Stage4["Stage 4: Validate"]
D1[Check Quality] --> D2[Run Tests if Applicable]
D2 --> D3{Issues Found?}
D3 -->|Yes| D4[Report & Propose Fixes]
D4 --> D5[Wait for Approval]
D5 --> D6[Apply Approved Fixes]
D6 --> D2
D3 -->|No| D7[Ask: Review Work?]
end
subgraph Stage5["Stage 5: Summarize"]
E1[Create Summary] --> E2[Show Changes]
E2 --> E3[Suggest Next Steps]
end
subgraph Stage6["Stage 6: Confirm Completion"]
F1[Ask if Satisfied] --> F2{Session Files?}
F2 -->|Yes| F3[Ask about Cleanup]
F2 -->|No| F4[Done]
F3 --> F5[Cleanup on Approval]
F5 --> F4
end
A3 -->|Question| Answer[Direct Answer]
A3 -->|Task| Stage2
Stage2 --> Stage3
Stage3 --> Stage4
Stage4 --> Stage5
Stage5 --> Stage6
style Stage1 fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
style Stage2 fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
style Stage3 fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
style Stage4 fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
style Stage5 fill:#5A6C7D,stroke:#3D4E5C,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
style Stage6 fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
style Answer fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
graph TD
A[Receive User Request] --> B[Read & Parse Request]
B --> C{Assess Type}
C -->|Informational| D[Question Path]
C -->|Action Required| E[Task Path]
D --> D1[Prepare Direct Answer]
D1 --> D2[No Approval Needed]
D2 --> D3[Respond Immediately]
E --> E1[Assess Complexity]
E1 --> E2[Identify Required Resources]
E2 --> E3[Proceed to Stage 2]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style C fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D3 fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E3 fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
What happens: OpenAgent reads your request and decides if it's a question or a task.
Your experience: Instant - you don't see this happening.
graph TD
A[Task Identified] --> B[Analyze Requirements]
B --> C[Create Step-by-Step Plan]
C --> D[Format Plan for User]
D --> E[Present Plan to User]
E --> F{User Response}
F -->|Approve| G[Proceed to Stage 3]
F -->|Request Changes| H[Revise Plan]
F -->|Reject/Cancel| I[Cancel Task]
H --> C
I --> J[End - Task Cancelled]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style E fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style F fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style G fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style H fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style I fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style J fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
What happens: OpenAgent creates a plan and shows it to you.
Critical Rule: OpenAgent ALWAYS requests approval before ANY execution (bash, write, edit, task delegation). This is absolute and strictly enforced. Read and list operations do not require approval.
Your experience: You see something like:
## Proposed Plan
1. Create README.md file
2. Add project overview section
3. Add installation instructions
4. Add usage examples
**Approval needed before proceeding.**
What you do: Review the plan and say "yes" or "no" (or ask for changes).
graph TD
A[Approval Received] --> B[Review Plan Steps]
B --> C{Need Context Files?}
C -->|Yes| D[Create Session]
C -->|No| E[Proceed Without Session]
D --> F[Generate Session ID]
F --> G[Create Context Files]
G --> H[Update Manifest]
H --> I{Delegate or Direct?}
E --> I
I -->|Delegate| J[Identify Specialist Agent]
I -->|Direct| K[Execute Steps Directly]
J --> L[Pass Context Files]
L --> M[Specialist Executes]
M --> N[Integrate Results]
K --> O[Complete Execution]
N --> O
O --> P[Proceed to Stage 4]
style A fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style I fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style J fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style K fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style P fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
What happens: OpenAgent carries out the plan, either directly or by delegating to specialist agents.
Your experience: You might see:
- Files being created or modified
- Commands being run
- Progress updates
- Results from specialist agents
Behind the scenes: OpenAgent might create temporary files to preserve context between steps.
graph TD
A[Execution Complete] --> B[Check Quality]
B --> C{Tests Applicable?}
C -->|Yes| D[Run Tests]
C -->|No| E[Manual Validation]
D --> F{Tests Pass?}
E --> G{Quality OK?}
F -->|Pass| H[All Checks Passed]
G -->|Yes| H
F -->|Fail| I[STOP Execution]
G -->|No| I
I --> J[Report Issues Clearly]
J --> K[Propose Fix Plan]
K --> L[Request Approval]
L --> M{User Approves Fix?}
M -->|Yes| N[Apply Fixes]
M -->|No| O[End - Issues Remain]
N --> D
H --> P[Ask: Additional Checks?]
P --> Q{User Response}
Q -->|Run More Tests| R[Run Specific Tests]
Q -->|Review Files| S[Review Specific Files]
Q -->|Proceed| T[Proceed to Stage 5]
R --> H
S --> H
style A fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style F fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style G fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style H fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style I fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style L fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style M fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style T fill:#5A6C7D,stroke:#3D4E5C,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
What happens: OpenAgent checks the quality of the work, runs tests if applicable, and ensures everything works correctly.
Critical Rules Enforced:
- STOP on failure - Immediately stops execution when tests fail or errors occur
- REPORT first - Always reports issues before proposing fixes
- NEVER auto-fix - Always requests approval before fixing issues
Your experience when validation passes: You see:
✅ Validation complete - all checks passed.
Would you like me to run any additional checks or review the work before I summarize?
- Run specific tests
- Check specific files
- Review changes
- Proceed to summary
What you do: Choose to review further or proceed to summary.
If OpenAgent runs tests or validation and finds issues, it follows a strict protocol (Critical Rule):
What happens:
- ⛔ STOPS execution immediately (no auto-fix)
- 📋 REPORTS all issues/failures clearly
- 📝 PROPOSES a fix plan with specific steps
⚠️ REQUESTS APPROVAL before fixing (absolute requirement)- ✅ PROCEEDS only after you approve
- 🔄 RE-VALIDATES after fixes are applied
Your experience: You see something like:
## Validation Results
❌ 3 tests failed:
- test_user_auth: Expected 200, got 401
- test_login: Missing token in response
- test_logout: Session not cleared
## Proposed Fix Plan
1. Update auth middleware to return proper status codes
2. Add token generation to login endpoint
3. Add session cleanup to logout handler
**Approval needed before proceeding with fixes.**
Critical: OpenAgent will NEVER auto-fix issues without your explicit approval. This is an absolute rule with strict enforcement. After fixes are applied, validation runs again to ensure everything passes.
graph TD
A[Validation Complete & User Satisfied] --> B{Task Complexity}
B -->|Simple Question| C[Natural Conversational Response]
B -->|Simple Task| D[Brief Summary]
B -->|Complex Task| E[Formal Summary]
D --> D1[Brief: Created X or Updated Y]
E --> E1[List Accomplishments]
E1 --> E2[Detail Changes Made]
E2 --> E3[Suggest Next Steps]
C --> F[Proceed to Stage 6]
D1 --> F
E3 --> F
style A fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style B fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E fill:#5A6C7D,stroke:#3D4E5C,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style F fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
What happens: After validation passes and you're satisfied, OpenAgent creates a summary of what was accomplished.
Your experience: You see a summary like:
## Summary
Created README.md with project documentation.
**Changes Made:**
- Created README.md
- Added project overview
- Added installation guide
- Added usage examples
**Next Steps:** Review the README and update as needed.
graph TD
A[Summary Presented] --> B[Ask: Is This Satisfactory?]
B --> C{User Satisfied?}
C -->|No| D[Identify Issues]
D --> E[Return to Appropriate Stage]
C -->|Yes| F{Session Files Created?}
F -->|No| G[Task Complete]
F -->|Yes| H[Ask: Cleanup Session Files?]
H --> I{User Approves Cleanup?}
I -->|No| J[Keep Session Files]
J --> K[Task Complete - Files Preserved]
I -->|Yes| L[Delete Context Files]
L --> M[Update Manifest]
M --> N[Remove Session Folder]
N --> O[Confirm Cleanup Complete]
O --> P[Task Complete - Cleaned Up]
style A fill:#5A6C7D,stroke:#3D4E5C,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style C fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#D0021B,stroke:#A00116,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style F fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style G fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style I fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style K fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style P fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
What happens: OpenAgent asks if you're satisfied and if temporary files should be cleaned up.
Critical Rule: OpenAgent ALWAYS confirms before deleting session files or cleanup operations. This is absolute and strictly enforced.
Your experience: You see:
Is this complete and satisfactory?
Should I clean up temporary session files at .tmp/sessions/20250118-143022-a4f2/?
What you do: Confirm you're happy with the results and approve cleanup if needed.
When OpenAgent works on complex tasks, it creates a session to keep track of everything.
A session is like a temporary workspace where OpenAgent stores:
- Context files (requirements, specifications)
- Task breakdowns
- Notes for specialist agents
- Progress tracking
graph TD
A[Session Folder] --> B[manifest file]
A --> C[features folder]
A --> D[tasks folder]
A --> E[code folder]
A --> F[documentation folder]
A --> G[Other categories]
B --> B1[Tracks all files]
B --> B2[Keywords for search]
B --> B3[Creation timestamps]
C --> C1[Requirements and specs]
D --> D1[Task breakdowns]
E --> E1[Implementation notes]
F --> F1[Documentation context]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style B fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:2px,color:#000
style D fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:2px,color:#000
style E fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:2px,color:#000
style F fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:2px,color:#000
style G fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:2px,color:#000
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OpenAgent
participant Session
User->>OpenAgent: Request complex task
OpenAgent->>OpenAgent: Needs context file?
OpenAgent->>Session: Create session (lazy)
Session-->>OpenAgent: Session ID: abc123
OpenAgent->>Session: Create context files
OpenAgent->>OpenAgent: Execute task
OpenAgent->>User: Show results
User->>OpenAgent: Confirm done
OpenAgent->>User: Cleanup session files?
User->>OpenAgent: Yes
OpenAgent->>Session: Delete session
Session-->>OpenAgent: Cleaned up
OpenAgent->>User: All done!
Lazy Initialization: Sessions are only created when actually needed (not for simple tasks). OpenAgent follows a "lazy" philosophy - only creates sessions/files when truly necessary.
Unique IDs: Each session gets a unique ID like 20250118-143022-a4f2 to prevent conflicts.
Safe Cleanup: OpenAgent only deletes files it created, and only after you approve (Critical Rule).
Concurrent Safety: Multiple users can work simultaneously without interfering with each other.
One of OpenAgent's superpowers is remembering context across multiple steps.
Imagine this scenario:
- You ask: "Build a user authentication system"
- OpenAgent creates requirements and task breakdown
- Later, you ask: "Implement the login component"
Without context loading: OpenAgent wouldn't remember the requirements from step 1. With context loading: OpenAgent finds and uses the requirements automatically.
graph TD
subgraph Step1["Step 1: Create Context"]
A1[User requests auth system] --> A2[Create requirements file]
A2 --> A3[Add to manifest with keywords]
A3 --> A4[Keywords added]
end
subgraph Step2["Step 2: Create Tasks"]
B1[Delegate to task-manager] --> B2[Create task breakdown]
B2 --> B3[Add to manifest with keywords]
B3 --> B4[Keywords added]
end
subgraph Step3["Step 3: Use Context"]
C1[User requests login] --> C2[Search manifest]
C2 --> C3[Find related files]
C3 --> C4[Pass paths to specialist]
C4 --> C5[Specialist reads context]
end
Step1 --> Step2
Step2 --> Step3
style Step1 fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
style Step2 fill:#50E3C2,stroke:#3AB89E,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
style Step3 fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
The manifest is like an index that tracks all context files:
{
"session_id": "20250118-143022-a4f2",
"context_files": {
"features/user-auth-context.md": {
"created": "2025-01-18T14:30:22Z",
"for": "@task-manager",
"keywords": ["user-auth", "authentication", "features"]
},
"tasks/user-auth-tasks.md": {
"created": "2025-01-18T14:32:15Z",
"for": "@task-manager",
"keywords": ["user-auth", "tasks", "breakdown"]
}
},
"context_index": {
"user-auth": [
"features/user-auth-context.md",
"tasks/user-auth-tasks.md"
]
}
}Benefits:
- ✅ No context loss across steps
- ✅ Automatic discovery by keywords
- ✅ Flexible - only loads what's needed
- ✅ Traceable - you can see what context was used
OpenAgent is a universal agent that handles most tasks directly. It only delegates when truly needed.
OpenAgent's Capabilities: Write code, docs, tests, reviews, analysis, debugging, research, bash operations, file operations
Default Approach: Execute directly, fetch context files as needed (lazy loading), keep it simple
Delegate Only When:
- 4+ files to modify/create
- Specialized expertise needed (security, algorithms, architecture, performance)
- Thorough multi-component review required
- Complex dependencies and coordination
- Need fresh perspective or alternative approaches
- Testing scenarios, edge cases, what-if analysis
- User explicitly requests breakdown/delegation
graph TD
A[Receive Task] --> B{What type?}
B -->|Question| C[Answer Directly]
B -->|Task| D{How complex?}
D -->|4+ files OR specialized expertise| E[Delegate to task-manager]
E --> E1[Breaks down into subtasks]
D -->|Comprehensive docs OR multi-page| F[Delegate to documentation]
F --> F1[Creates structured docs]
D -->|Need perspective OR simulation| G[Delegate to general agent]
G --> G1[Fresh eyes, alternatives, testing]
D -->|Specialized code task| H[Delegate to code specialists]
H --> H1[Testing, review, build]
D -->|Simple OR 1-3 files OR straightforward| I[Execute Directly]
I --> I1[OpenAgent handles it]
style A fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style B fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style C fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style D fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
style E fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style F fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style G fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style H fill:#6B7C93,stroke:#4A5568,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style I fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
- ✅ Feature spans 4+ files/modules
- ✅ Complex dependencies between components
- ✅ Needs breakdown into subtasks
- ✅ User explicitly requests task breakdown
Example: "Build user authentication system with 5+ components"
- ✅ Creating comprehensive docs (API docs, guides, tutorials)
- ✅ Multi-page documentation
- ✅ Requires codebase analysis/research
- ✅ User explicitly requests documentation agent
Example: "Create API documentation for all endpoints"
- ✅ Need fresh perspective or alternative approaches
- ✅ Simulation of scenarios, edge cases, what-if analysis
- ✅ Brainstorming different solutions
- ✅ Complex research requiring multiple rounds of search
Examples:
- "Review this API design - what could go wrong?" → Fresh perspective
- "Simulate edge cases for this algorithm" → Testing scenarios
- "What are alternative approaches to solve X?" → Brainstorming
- ✅ Specialized code task (testing, review, build)
- ✅ Thorough review across multiple components
- ✅ Code subagents are available in current profile
Examples:
- "Review this code for security issues" → @code/reviewer
- "Write tests for this module" → @code/tester
- "Run build and fix errors" → @code/build-agent
- ✅ 1-3 files to modify/create
- ✅ Straightforward task with clear implementation
- ✅ Quick updates/edits
- ✅ User explicitly asks openagent to handle it
Examples:
- "Create a README"
- "Fix this bug in auth.ts"
- "Add input validation to this function"
- "Update this function to use async/await"
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OpenAgent
participant Session
participant Specialist
User->>OpenAgent: "Build authentication system"
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 1: Analyze
OpenAgent->>OpenAgent: Complex task, needs task-manager
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 2: Approve
OpenAgent->>User: ## Proposed Plan<br/>1. Create requirements<br/>2. Delegate to task-manager<br/>3. Review breakdown<br/><br/>**Approval needed**
User->>OpenAgent: Approved
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 3: Execute
OpenAgent->>Session: Create session abc123
OpenAgent->>Session: Create features/user-auth-context.md
Session-->>OpenAgent: File created, added to manifest
OpenAgent->>Specialist: @task-manager: Break down auth system<br/>Context: .tmp/sessions/abc123/features/user-auth-context.md
Specialist->>Session: Create tasks/user-auth-tasks.md
Specialist-->>OpenAgent: Task breakdown complete
OpenAgent->>Session: Update manifest with new file
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 4: Validate
OpenAgent->>OpenAgent: Check quality, run tests
OpenAgent->>User: ✅ Validation complete - all checks passed.<br/><br/>Would you like me to run any additional checks<br/>or review the work before I summarize?
User->>OpenAgent: Proceed to summary
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 5: Summarize
OpenAgent->>User: ## Summary<br/>Created task breakdown with 5 subtasks<br/><br/>**Changes:**<br/>- Created context file<br/>- Created task breakdown
Note over OpenAgent: Stage 6: Confirm
OpenAgent->>User: Is this complete and satisfactory?<br/>Should I clean up session files?
User->>OpenAgent: Yes, looks good. Clean up.
OpenAgent->>Session: Delete session abc123
Session-->>OpenAgent: Cleaned up
OpenAgent->>User: ✓ All done!
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OpenAgent
participant Manifest
participant Specialist
Note over User,Specialist: Step 1: Initial Request
User->>OpenAgent: "Build auth system"
OpenAgent->>Manifest: Create features/user-auth-context.md<br/>Keywords: [user-auth, authentication]
OpenAgent->>Specialist: @task-manager
Specialist->>Manifest: Create tasks/user-auth-tasks.md<br/>Keywords: [user-auth, tasks]
Note over User,Specialist: Step 2: Later Request
User->>OpenAgent: "Implement login component"
OpenAgent->>Manifest: Search for "login" or "user-auth"
Manifest-->>OpenAgent: Found:<br/>- features/user-auth-context.md<br/>- tasks/user-auth-tasks.md
OpenAgent->>Specialist: @coder-agent: Implement login<br/><br/>Related context:<br/>- features/user-auth-context.md<br/>- tasks/user-auth-tasks.md
Specialist->>Manifest: Read context files
Specialist-->>OpenAgent: Login component implemented with full context
Note over OpenAgent: ✓ No context loss!
graph TD
subgraph UserA["User A Session"]
A1[Request: Build auth] --> A2[Session abc123]
A2 --> A3[features context]
A2 --> A4[tasks context]
end
subgraph UserB["User B Session"]
B1[Request: Build payment] --> B2[Session def456]
B2 --> B3[features context]
B2 --> B4[tasks context]
end
subgraph Isolation["Session Isolation"]
I1[Unique Session IDs]
I2[Separate Folders]
I3[Independent Manifests]
I4[No Conflicts]
end
A2 -.->|Isolated| Isolation
B2 -.->|Isolated| Isolation
style UserA fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
style UserB fill:#7ED321,stroke:#5FA319,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
style Isolation fill:#F5A623,stroke:#C17D11,stroke-width:4px,color:#000
Instead of: "Make this better" Try: "Refactor this function to use async/await and add error handling"
Why: Specific requests help OpenAgent create better plans and get approval faster.
When OpenAgent shows you a plan, take a moment to review it:
- ✅ Does it match what you want?
- ✅ Are there any steps you'd change?
- ✅ Is anything missing?
Tip: You can ask OpenAgent to revise the plan before approving.
For complex projects, break them into steps:
Step 1: "Build user authentication system"
→ Review task breakdown
Step 2: "Implement the registration component"
→ OpenAgent uses context from Step 1
Step 3: "Implement the login component"
→ OpenAgent uses context from Steps 1 & 2
Why: OpenAgent preserves context across steps, making each step easier.
Let OpenAgent delegate to specialists:
- Complex features → Let task-manager break them down
- Documentation → Let documentation agent create comprehensive docs
- Code review → Let reviewer agent check for issues
Tip: You can explicitly request a specialist: "Use the documentation agent to create API docs"
After completing a workflow, approve session cleanup:
- ✅ Keeps your workspace clean
- ✅ Prevents accumulation of temporary files
- ✅ Frees up disk space
Tip: You can also manually clean up stale sessions:
./scripts/maintenance/cleanup-stale-sessions.shWhen working on related tasks, use consistent terminology:
- "user authentication" (not "auth" in one request and "login system" in another)
- "payment processing" (not "payments" and "checkout" interchangeably)
Why: Helps OpenAgent find related context files more easily.
When making follow-up requests, reference previous work:
Good: "Implement the login component from the auth system we planned earlier" Better: "Implement the login component using the user-auth requirements"
Why: Helps OpenAgent search for the right context files.
You can adjust when OpenAgent delegates by modifying the criteria in .opencode/agent/core/openagent.md:
Current defaults:
- 4+ files → Delegate to task-manager
- Specialized expertise needed → Delegate to appropriate specialist
- 1-3 files → Execute directly
To customize: Edit the <delegation_rules> section to match your preferences.
The default categories are:
- features, documentation, code, refactoring, testing, tasks, general
To add custom categories: Edit the <categories> line in openagent.md:
<categories>features | documentation | code | refactoring | testing | general | tasks | your-category</categories>Use case: If you frequently work on "migrations" or "integrations", add those as categories.
Occasionally check .tmp/sessions/ to see what context is being preserved:
ls -la .tmp/sessions/Why: Helps you understand what context OpenAgent is using and identify any issues.
When learning a new codebase or technology, use OpenAgent's approval step as a learning opportunity:
- Read the plan carefully
- Ask questions about steps you don't understand
- Request explanations before approving
Example:
OpenAgent: "I'll refactor this to use dependency injection"
You: "What is dependency injection and why is it better here?"
OpenAgent: [Explains]
You: "Got it, approved!"
OpenAgent works great with other agents in your profile:
- Use OpenAgent for planning and coordination
- Let specialists handle their domains
- OpenAgent will preserve context between them
Example workflow:
- OpenAgent plans the feature
- @coder-agent implements it
- @tester writes tests
- @reviewer checks quality
- @documentation documents it
All coordinated by OpenAgent with preserved context!
For recurring workflows, create context templates:
Example: .opencode/templates/feature-context.md
# Feature: {FEATURE_NAME}
## Requirements
- [List requirements]
## Constraints
- [List constraints]
## Success Criteria
- [List criteria]Use: "Create a new feature using the feature-context template"
If something goes wrong, note the session ID:
Session: 20250118-143022-a4f2
You can inspect the session folder to see what context was created:
cat .tmp/sessions/20250118-143022-a4f2/.manifest.jsonGroup related tasks in one session for better context:
Instead of:
- Request 1: "Create user model"
- Request 2: "Create auth controller"
- Request 3: "Create login route"
Try:
- Request: "Build user authentication with model, controller, and routes"
Why: Single session, all context preserved, more efficient.
OpenAgent follows these core principles:
Concise responses, no over-explanation. Gets to the point quickly.
Conversational for questions, formal for tasks. Matches the context.
Only creates sessions/files when actually needed. No unnecessary overhead. Fetches context files on-demand.
ALWAYS requests approval before ANY execution (bash, write, edit, task delegation). Confirms before cleanup. This is an absolute rule with strict enforcement.
When tests fail or issues are found:
- STOP immediately (no auto-fix)
- REPORT the issues clearly
- PROPOSE fix plan
- REQUEST APPROVAL (mandatory)
- FIX (only after approval)
Never auto-fixes - you're always in control. This is an absolute rule with strict enforcement.
Three critical rules are enforced with absolute priority:
- Approval Gate - Always request approval before execution
- Stop on Failure - Stop immediately on test failures or errors, never auto-fix
- Confirm Cleanup - Always confirm before deleting session files
OpenAgent is your intelligent universal agent that:
✅ Plans before acting - Shows you the plan and waits for approval (Critical Rule) ✅ Preserves context - Remembers information across multiple steps ✅ Executes directly - Handles most tasks itself, delegates only when needed ✅ Keeps you in control - Always confirms before cleanup (Critical Rule) ✅ Handles general tasks - Questions, docs, coordination, simple updates (delegates complex coding to opencoder) ✅ Reports before fixing - Never auto-fixes issues without approval (Critical Rule)
Key Takeaways:
- Be specific in your requests
- Review plans before approving
- Use multi-step workflows for complex projects
- OpenAgent handles most tasks directly - delegation is the exception, not the rule
- Clean up sessions when done
- Customize to fit your workflow
- Expect reports before fixes when issues are found (never auto-fix)
Ready to get started? Just ask OpenAgent a question or request a task!
OpenAgent is configured in .opencode/agent/core/openagent.md. You can customize:
- Delegation thresholds (when to delegate vs execute directly)
- Execution philosophy (universal agent approach)
- Critical rules enforcement
- Workflow stages
- Context loading behavior
- And more!
OpenAgent has been optimized based on research-backed prompt engineering patterns:
✅ Critical rules positioned early - Safety rules appear in the first 15% of the prompt with absolute priority ✅ Minimal nesting complexity - Flattened XML structure (max 2 levels) for maximum clarity ✅ Modular design - Context files loaded on-demand (lazy loading) ✅ Explicit prioritization - 3-tier priority system with conflict resolution ✅ Single source of truth - Critical rules defined once and referenced throughout ✅ Universal agent philosophy - Execute directly first, delegate only when truly needed
Key Principles:
- Tier 1 (Highest): Safety & Approval Gates - Always override other tiers
- Tier 2: Core Workflow - Stage progression and delegation routing
- Tier 3: Optimization - Lazy initialization, session management, context discovery
Effectiveness improvements are model- and task-specific. These patterns are validated by Stanford/Anthropic research but actual performance gains vary based on your specific use case.
OpenAgent uses context files from .opencode/context/core/ on-demand (lazy loading):
Standards (quality guidelines):
standards/code.md- Modular, functional code patternsstandards/docs.md- Documentation standardsstandards/tests.md- Testing standardsstandards/patterns.md- Core patternsstandards/analysis.md- Analysis framework
Workflows (process templates):
workflows/delegation.md- Delegation template and processworkflows/task-breakdown.md- Task breakdown methodologyworkflows/sessions.md- Session lifecycle managementworkflows/review.md- Code review guidelines
These files are fetched only when needed, keeping the system lean and efficient. OpenAgent references them without the @ symbol (e.g., standards/code.md not @standards/code.md).
Happy building! 🚀