Skip to content

T8943: sweep HIGH-producer pins to renamed branches (rollout 1c)#33

Merged
andamasov merged 1 commit into
currentfrom
chore/rollout-1c-high-pin-sweep
May 30, 2026
Merged

T8943: sweep HIGH-producer pins to renamed branches (rollout 1c)#33
andamasov merged 1 commit into
currentfrom
chore/rollout-1c-high-pin-sweep

Conversation

@andamasov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rollout 1c Task 2 — target-aware HIGH-producer pin sweep. Rewrites uses: pins to vyos/.github, vyos/vyos-cla-signatures, and VyOS-Networks/vyos-reusable-workflows from their old default branch to the production compat branch (staged in Task 1). No functional change; canary (vyos/vyos-1x#5240) Phase-0-clean. Kept draft to avoid redundant bot CodeRabbit cycles; admin-merged. Tracking: T8943

Rewrites uses: pins to the three HIGH-fanout producers (vyos/.github,
vyos/vyos-cla-signatures, VyOS-Networks/vyos-reusable-workflows) from their
old default branch to the new production compat branch staged in Task 1.
No functional change; pin-ref rewrite only.

Tracking: T8943
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: dc9a23ce-31b5-4aa2-9acf-0004c66de7d7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c693b56 and 30e34fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/chceck-pr-message.yml
  • .github/workflows/check-pr-conflicts.yml
  • .github/workflows/check-stale.yml
  • .github/workflows/cla-check.yml
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml
  • .github/workflows/pr-mirror-repo-sync.yml
  • .github/workflows/trigger-rebuild-repo-package.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI/CD workflow configurations to use production-stable versions instead of development versions, ensuring consistent and tested workflow execution across the repository.

Walkthrough

Seven GitHub Actions workflows now reference reusable workflows from the @production ref instead of @current. The updates apply to PR validation (message format, conflicts, staleness), code analysis (CodeQL), CLA verification, repository synchronization, and package rebuild trigger workflows.

Changes

Workflow Reference Migration to Production

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update reusable workflow references to production
.github/workflows/chceck-pr-message.yml, .github/workflows/check-pr-conflicts.yml, .github/workflows/check-stale.yml, .github/workflows/cla-check.yml, .github/workflows/codeql.yml, .github/workflows/pr-mirror-repo-sync.yml, .github/workflows/trigger-rebuild-repo-package.yml
All uses: references to external reusable workflows switch from @current to @production, redirecting PR validation, analysis, integration, and repository operation jobs to the production workflow definitions.

Possibly Related PRs

  • vyos/vyatta-bash#32: Updates the PR message checking workflow to call the reusable check-pr-message.yml from @production instead of @current, overlapping with this PR's PR message validation reference update.
✨ Finishing Touches
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch chore/rollout-1c-high-pin-sweep

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👍
No issues in PR Title / Commit Title

@mergify mergify Bot added the current label May 30, 2026
@andamasov andamasov marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2026 13:05
@andamasov andamasov merged commit 90426af into current May 30, 2026
5 checks passed
@andamasov andamasov deleted the chore/rollout-1c-high-pin-sweep branch June 10, 2026 03:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant