Skip to content

Document WG security review requirements for protocols #215

Open
@timcappalli

Description

@timcappalli

"MUST have undergone security review by the Federated Identity Working Group."

@bvandersloot-mozilla: Do we want to define the criteria by which this group would review those?

One comment from the registry criteria PR is that the spec needs to define the criteria for the security review. Where in the spec this should go is TBD and we should discuss here...

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions