Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：`采`→`采用`？

> [!TIP]
> Update: The original part of this issue was resolved in #645. Please see https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/644#issuecomment-2582502932 for other parts.

CLReq 目前大多写`采用`、`采取`，有些单独的`采`读不太通，建议改正。

- 单独的`采`
	> [与汉字**采**相同的书写方向](https://github.com/w3c/clreq/blob/fc110489ebf5a5a4aedb6a75d0e76909d50dbc82/index.html#L406-L407)

- 同一句混合`采用`、`采`
	> [**采用**`[．]`为句号、**采**`[,]`或`[，]`为逗号与顿号](https://github.com/w3c/clreq/blob/fc110489ebf5a5a4aedb6a75d0e76909d50dbc82/index.html#L1097-L1098)

- 个别单独的`采`影响断句（`与/内文/采/相同`而非`……/文采/相同`）
	> [Check this translation: 与内文**采**相同文字尺寸](https://github.com/w3c/clreq/blob/fc110489ebf5a5a4aedb6a75d0e76909d50dbc82/index.html#L4236-L4237)

[北大CCL语料库](http://ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus/index.jsp)的现代汉语数据中，[`采用相同`出现于 321 个文档](http://ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus/search?q=采用相同&dir=xiandai)，而[`采相同`只出现于 12 个文档](http://ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus/search?q=采相同&dir=xiandai)，`采用`比单独的`采`常用二十多倍。不过我不确定是否有繁简差异。

<details>
<summary>截图</summary>

![图片](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2c0dc277-95e7-4267-8755-fe0d866a94c8)
![图片](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1207834a-413f-4ef4-8f31-9f1bf7976b51)
</details>

如果需要，我可以发PR。

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：`采`→`采用`？ #644

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：采→采用？ #644

Description

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：`采`→`采用`？ #644