@@ -2219,8 +2219,8 @@ Conditional Hiding: the 'position-visibility' property {#position-visibility}
22192219
22202220<pre class=propdef>
22212221Name : position-visibility
2222- Value : always | [ anchors -valid || anchors -visible || no-overflow ]
2223- Initial : anchors -visible
2222+ Value : always | [ anchor -valid || anchor -visible || no-overflow ]
2223+ Initial : anchor -visible
22242224Applies to : [=absolutely positioned boxes=]
22252225Percentages : n/a
22262226Inherited : no
@@ -2239,23 +2239,14 @@ depending on some commonly needed layout conditions.
22392239 (The box is displayed without regard for its anchors
22402240 or its overflowing status.)
22412241
2242- : <dfn>anchors -valid</dfn>
2242+ : <dfn>anchor -valid</dfn>
22432243 ::
2244- If any of the box's [=required anchor references=]
2245- do not resolve to a [=target anchor element=] ,
2244+ If the box references the [=default anchor box=]
2245+ (e.g. using 'position-area' , 'anchor()' or 'anchor-size()' functions, or ''anchor-center'' ),
2246+ but the [=default anchor box=] cannot be resolved,
22462247 the box's 'visibility' property computes to ''force-hidden'' .
22472248
2248- Issue: What is a <dfn dfn for>required anchor reference</dfn> ?
2249- ''anchor()'' functions that don't have a fallback value;
2250- the default anchor *sometimes*?
2251- Need more detail here.
2252-
2253- Issue: <em> Any</em> anchors are missing,
2254- or <em> all</em> anchors are missing?
2255- I can see use-cases for either, potentially.
2256- Do we want to make a decision here, or make it controllable somehow?
2257-
2258- : <dfn>anchors-visible</dfn>
2249+ : <dfn>anchor-visible</dfn>
22592250 ::
22602251 If the box has a [=default anchor box=]
22612252 but that [=anchor box=] is [=invisible=] or [=clipped by intervening boxes=] ,
@@ -2704,6 +2695,14 @@ No Privacy issues have been raised against this document.
27042695Changes {#changes}
27052696=======
27062697
2698+ Significant changes since the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2026/WD-css-anchor-position-1-20260327/">27 March 2026 Working Draft</a> :
2699+ * Defined ''position-visibility/anchor-valid'' to (like ''position-visibility/anchor-valid'' ) only check the [=default anchor box=] .
2700+ (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10201">Issue 10201</a> )
2701+ * Renamed <css> anchors-valid</css> and <css> anchors-visible</css>
2702+ to ''position-visibility/anchor-valid'' and ''position-visibility/anchor-visible''
2703+ since they only reference the [=default anchor box=] .
2704+ (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10201">Issue 10201</a> )
2705+
27072706Significant changes since the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2026/WD-css-anchor-position-1-20260130/">30 January 2026 Working Draft</a> :
27082707* Added ''position-area/match-parent'' value to 'position-area' .
27092708 (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8913">Issue 8913</a> )
0 commit comments