Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4

[svgeesus]

Wide review status for CSS Fonts 4

Horizontal review

• A11y review [Tracked]
• I18n review [Tracked]
• PING review [Tracked]
• Security review [Tracked]
• TAG: src descriptor | Variable fonts additions | font-palette and font-palette-values

Technical review

• UTC?
• SC29?

[svgeesus]

Privacy issues

[css-fonts] JS-free probing of Unicode support of fonts

[svgeesus]

Security review requested 6 Oct 2020

[fantasai]

Wide review includes people outside of W3C, and having the latest CSS Fonts 4 publication one year out of date isn't really conducive to that. Can we get the draft updated?

[svgeesus]

No problem, especially since the current PING vs. I18n impasse plus the uncertainty about new generic font families means we won't be going to CR anytime soon.

[fantasai]

@svgeesus We can publish whenever we want... so we should publish as often as needed to keep /TR consistent with CSSWG consensus!

[css-meeting-bot]

The CSS Working Group just discussed Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4, and agreed to the following:

• RESOLVED: republish a new WD

The full IRC log of that discussion

<dael> Topic: Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4
<dael> Rossen_: do we want a new CR?
<dael> fantasai: It's a WD
<dael> chris: Yes we do
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/4944
<dael> fantasai: We wanted the next as CR but it's not there
<fantasai> s/We/Chris/
<dael> RESOLVED: republish a new WD

[svgeesus]

RESOLVED: republish a new WD

Published 17 Nov

[svgeesus]

APA has requested an accessibility issue be mentioned