This erratum was raised by David Booth,
it is in our errata list, and does not seem to have been addressed in N-Triples.
Since we did explicitly indicate in N-Quads that it is an extension of N-Triples, my preference would be to not touch N-Triples and close this erratum as "wontfix". But in any case, I think we need a WG decision.
This erratum was raised by David Booth,
it is in our errata list, and does not seem to have been addressed in N-Triples.
Since we did explicitly indicate in N-Quads that it is an extension of N-Triples, my preference would be to not touch N-Triples and close this erratum as "wontfix". But in any case, I think we need a WG decision.