Replaced the space character in names by "_"

Author: MURATA Makoto

index.html

@@ -92,12 +92,12 @@
 	      date: "2009",
 	      publisher: "Shuueisha",
 	  },
-	  'Zhuyin Fuhao': {
+	  'Zhuyin_Fuhao': {
 	      title: "Scheme for the National Phonetic Alphabet (In Chinese, 注音字母方案)", 
 	      date: "1918",
 	      publisher: "Ministry of Education, Republic of China",
 	  },
-	  'Hanyu Pinyin': {
+	  'Hanyu_Pinyin': {
 	      title: "Resolution on the Scheme for the Chinese Phonetic Alphabet (Hanyu Pinyin) (In Chinese, 汉语拼音方案)",
 	      date: "1958",
 	      publisher: "National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China",
@@ -189,14 +189,14 @@ <h4 >(1) Japanese case</h4>
           <h4 >(2) Chinese case</h4>
 	  <p>In contrast, Chinese ruby annotations using pinyin and
           bopomofo have clearly documented modern origins tied to
-          state language policy. Bopomofo (Zhuyin Fuhao) was
+          state language policy. Bopomofo was
           officially adopted by the government of the Republic of
           China in 1918 as a phonetic system to support literacy and
-          pronunciation education [[Zhuyin Fuhao]]. Later, in the
+          pronunciation education [[Zhuyin_Fuhao]]. Later, in the
           People’s Republic of China, Hanyu Pinyin was formally
           promulgated in 1958 by a resolution of the National
           People’s Congress as a standardized romanization system for
-          Modern Standard Mandarin [[Hanyu Pinyin]].  Both systems
+          Modern Standard Mandarin [[Hanyu_Pinyin]].  Both systems
           were created explicitly for language planning, education,
           and standardization, and their use in ruby annotations
           reflects these policy-driven goals. Unlike Japanese ruby,