The link to the track could be more specific

[deniak]

As of today, the SOTD must mention the track the document is on and it must link to https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#recs-and-notes whathever the track is.
As discussed in w3c/webcodecs#644, that link could be more specific, e.g.:

• REC track
• Note track
• Registry track

Such change would need to be implemented in respec, bikeshed and specberus.

@plehegar, WDYT?

/cc @tidoust

[tidoust]

I note that, for registries, this is not so much about being more specific than about fulfilling the requirements imposed by the Process document, and in particular:

"The registry report [...] must [...] clearly label the registry report [...] as such, including a link to § 6.5 The Registry Track in this Process".
https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#reg-pub

The SOTD sentence seems like a good enough place to me to "clearly label the registry report as such", but the Process document currently requires a more specific link to §6.5.

[plehegar]

I'm supportive of having more specific links