Remove guidance around bundling dependent claims.

Author: msporny

index.html

@@ -6048,31 +6048,6 @@ <h4>Spoofing Attack</h4>
 to enable proof of control.
         </p>
       </section>
-      <section class="informative">
-        <h3>Bundling Dependent Claims</h3>
-
-        <p>
-It is considered best practice for [=issuers=] to atomize information in a
-[=credential=] or use a signature scheme that allows for selective
-disclosure. When atomizing information, if it is not done securely by the
-[=issuers=], the [=holders=] might bundle together [=claims=] from different
-[=credentials=] in ways that the [=issuers=] did not intend.
-        </p>
-
-        <p>
-Consider a university issuing two [=verifiable credentials=] to an individual.
-Each [=credential=] contains two properties that, when combined, indicate the
-person's "role" in a specific "department." For instance, one [=credential=]
-pair might designate "Staff Member" in the "Department of Computing," while
-another could signify "Post Graduate Student" in the "Department of Economics."
-Atomizing these [=verifiable credentials=] results in the university issuing
-four separate [=credentials=] to the individual. Each [=credential=] contains
-a single designation: "Staff Member", "Post Graduate Student", "Department of
-Computing", or "Department of Economics". The [=holder=] might then present
-the "Staff Member" and "Department of Economics" [=verifiable credentials=] to
-a [=verifier=], which, together, would comprise a false [=claim=].
-        </p>
-      </section>
 
       <section class="informative">
         <h3>Highly Dynamic Information</h3>