Issues with Issue Template for Initial Submission

[egekorkan]

• in the new binding, the title and name of binding are duplicate.
• title should be a placeholder
• Version String should not be "A unique string for that entry's history that denotes the version of the entry that is linked. " -> uniqueness is about that specific binding. However, this is not understood from the text.
• Summary of the binding should not be a placeholder so that the submitter can fill in the blanks
• Summary document better to give a template with easy examples within the template. Otherwise people will diverge and we need to explain each time
• We should find the correct wording for the W3C specs' Access and Usage Restrictions
• Add a place to add links to the Access and Usage Restrictions, i.e. policy.
• What is "bound" needs to be written somewhere. Either in the registry entry or in the summary document, i.e. WoT HTTP Binding should clearly link to the HTTP Protocol itself. This would be very relevant for protocols that have serial and tcp/udp based versions. Since this may need some clarification, probably better in the summary document.
• Submitter information is missing: We definitely need the affiliation or the "owner" of the binding's protocol. That is referred to in the issue templates.