You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: messaging-clustering-singleton/README.md
+26-2Lines changed: 26 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -263,11 +263,35 @@ _Note:_ You will see the following warnings in the log of the server that is _no
263
263
WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] (Thread-2 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)) AMQ222095: Connection failed with failedOver=false
264
264
265
265
266
-
_NOTE:_ You may see the following log message as well.When a server is restarted, it may broadcast that it is up and running (with its nodeID) while other nodes still reference the previous server instance for the same nodeID.
267
-
Eventually, the cluster will be informed of the new instance representing the given nodeID but as the warning explains, it is possible to see this log (once or more) when a server is restarted.
266
+
_Note:_ You may see the following log message as well. When a server is restarted, it may broadcast that it is up and running (with its nodeID) while other nodes still reference the previous server instance for the same nodeID. Eventually, the cluster will be informed of the new instance representing the given nodeID but as the warning explains, it is possible to see this log (once or more) when a server is restarted.
268
267
269
268
WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client] (activemq-discovery-group-thread-dg-group1) AMQ212034: There are more than one servers on the network broadcasting the same node id. You will see this message exactly once (per node) if a node is restarted, in which case it can be safely ignored. But if it is logged continuously it means you really do have more than one node on the same network active concurrently with the same node id. This could occur if you have a backup node active at the same time as its live node. nodeID=a114b652-689e-11e7-a2f4-54ee751c6182
270
269
270
+
_Note:_ The next error message is a [known issue](https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9261). You can ignore it, as it does not affect the scenario that this quickstart reproduces:
271
+
272
+
ERROR [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] (Thread-3 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)) AMQ224037: cluster connection Failed to handle message: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot find binding for jms.queue.HelloWorldMDBQueuedea3e995-713c-11e7-85f2-b8f6b112daf7 on ClusterConnectionImpl@1129705701[nodeUUID=dabaa1fa-713c-11e7-8f3a-b8f6b112daf7, connector=TransportConfiguration(name=http-connector, factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) ?httpUpgradeEndpoint=http-acceptor&activemqServerName=default&httpUpgradeEnabled=true&port=9080&host=localhost, address=jms, server=ActiveMQServerImpl::serverUUID=dabaa1fa-713c-11e7-8f3a-b8f6b112daf7]
273
+
274
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.doConsumerCreated(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1294)
275
+
276
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.handleNotificationMessage(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1029)
277
+
278
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.onMessage(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1004)
279
+
280
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.callOnMessage(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1001)
281
+
282
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.access$400(ClientConsumerImpl.java:49)
283
+
284
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl$Runner.run(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1124)
285
+
286
+
at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.OrderedExecutorFactory$OrderedExecutor$ExecutorTask.run(OrderedExecutorFactory.java:101)
287
+
288
+
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
289
+
290
+
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
0 commit comments