Sourcehut integration #2288
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
the core team has other prios ... but if somebody like to pick this issue up ... if he can can cover the remote interface with a SH specific impl it's done ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
(sorry to necro this, I know it's been over three years 😄) Hey! I was actually just looking into this today because I'm also interested in using Woodpecker with Sourcehut, however, based on my reading of the Forge interface requirements and what Sourcehut supports, the job looks like it might be a bit more involved. Sourcehut has both an OAuth 2.0 provider as well as a GraphQL API, but it looks like they might only support checking out private repos using SSH. If we wanted to add this to Woodpecker, it might involve either generating SSH keys to attach to the I'm happy to keep looking into this if we think it's feasible, I know @6543 pointed to the remote API which right now looks like it's called Custom Forge on the current docs. The tricky bit would just be cloning the repo during a build. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Clear and concise description of the problem
It would be cool to have the option to use Woodpecker CI for the sourcehut forge.
Suggested solution
Not familiar enough with Woodpecker to make a suggested solution.
Alternative
Sourcehut has its own CI service, but Woodpecker seems to have more features. https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/
Additional context
No response
Validations
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions